How about 6 months? And closing it if there’s been no follow-up to the bot’s comment after 3 months?
Rebecca On Mon, Oct 28, 2024, at 11:43 PM, Michael D Kinney wrote: > I believe the timeframe to mark one stale is configurable. > > Is there a proposal for a different wait time? > > Mike > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rebecca Cran <rebe...@bsdio.com> >> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2024 7:35 PM >> To: devel@edk2.groups.io >> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com> >> Subject: Could we reconsider the GitHub stale PR bot please? >> >> See the attached screenshot or >> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/5907#issuecomment-2408745999 . >> >> The PR was marked stale by the bot and the PR author only responded two >> weeks later - which would have been one week too late. >> >> Fortunately I noticed and commented to keep it open, but I think we >> should reconsider the use of the stale bot. >> >> >> -- >> Rebecca > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#120692): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/120692 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/109271104/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
