I recall clang having more restrictions on redefining keywords. Mike
> -----Original Message----- > From: Oliver Smith-Denny <o...@linux.microsoft.com> > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 1:38 PM > To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; > devel@edk2.groups.io; pedro.falc...@gmail.com > Cc: rebe...@bsdio.com > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-CCodingStandardsSpecification PATCH 1/1] > Prefer use of `static` C keyword over EDK2 type `STATIC` > > On 10/21/2024 1:35 PM, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > > Would it help if code was modified to completely remove the use of > > static in local variables and enforce that going forward and limit > > use of static to functions and global variables? > > > > We'd have to test further, but I believe that would allow Pedro's > scheme of simply `#define static <nothing>` to work. I ran a > quick godbolt test and it seems MSVC is also okay with that. > > Oliver -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#120643): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/120643 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/108941574/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
