On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 09:09:21AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> hello Usama,
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 04:46:15PM +0100, Usama Arif wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
> > @@ -60,7 +60,9 @@ int __init efi_tpm_eventlog_init(void)
> > }
> >
> > tbl_size = sizeof(*log_tbl) + log_tbl->size;
> > - memblock_reserve(efi.tpm_log, tbl_size);
> > + if (!memblock_reserve(efi.tpm_log, tbl_size)) {
> > + arch_update_firmware_area(efi.tpm_log, tbl_size);
> > + }
>
> Shouldn't you reserve the region into 8250 independently of
> memblock_reserve() return value?
>
> Thanks for the patch,
> --breno
Probably also want some sanity check here that we're not over
writing already reserved areas before we just update the map.
If we're dealing with the scenario where we can't trust the
hardware/efi generated map, we probably want to put a small
amount of effort to ensure we're not wrecking the state when
the system is working correctly.
Only so much we can do in this scenario.
~Gregory
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#120546): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/120546
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/108376671/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
