On 2024-07-01 13:58, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:

diff --git a/Platform/Qemu/SbsaQemu/SbsaQemu.dsc b/Platform/Qemu/SbsaQemu/SbsaQemu.dsc
index 9306986bf7c0..3463e5c7a635 100644
--- a/Platform/Qemu/SbsaQemu/SbsaQemu.dsc
+++ b/Platform/Qemu/SbsaQemu/SbsaQemu.dsc
@@ -148,7 +148,9 @@ [LibraryClasses.common]
    #

Since sbsa-ref still supports processors without FEAT_RNG, this may cause unexpected breakages for some users.

That's why I sent it as more of RFC than changes for merging.

Could we first of all conditionalise this change:

[Defines]
...
   DEFINE_DEBUG_PRINT_ERROR_LEVEL = ...
   DEFINE FEATRNG_ENABLE         = TRUE

so that someone who still wishes to run tests against older cpus can still do so through a rebuild with -D FEATRNG_ENABLE=FALSE

Is there a way to load both BaseRngLib and BaseRngLibTimerLib and switch
between them depending on availability of FEAT_RNG?

Not without severe hackery. The library is statically linked into RngDxe.

diff --git a/Platform/Qemu/SbsaQemu/SbsaQemu.fdf b/Platform/Qemu/SbsaQemu/SbsaQemu.fdf
index b35f42e11aa4..51a1ef8519f9 100644
--- a/Platform/Qemu/SbsaQemu/SbsaQemu.fdf
+++ b/Platform/Qemu/SbsaQemu/SbsaQemu.fdf
@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ [FV.FvMain]
    INF ArmPkg/Drivers/TimerDxe/TimerDxe.inf
    INF OvmfPkg/VirtNorFlashDxe/VirtNorFlashDxe.inf
    INF MdeModulePkg/Universal/WatchdogTimerDxe/WatchdogTimer.inf
+  INF SecurityPkg/RandomNumberGenerator/RngDxe/RngDxe.inf

Second:
What is the failure mode of running the BaseRngLib flavour on cpus that don't support FEAT_RNG? RngDxe itself seems to do the right thing, but do we get any warning messages or will certain operations now fail silently?

On FEAT_RNG cores we get:

InstallProtocolInterface: BC62157E-3E33-4FEC-9920-2D3B36D750DF 101FAD68798
ProtectUefiImageCommon - 0xFAD683C0
   - 0x00000101FBBDB000 - 0x0000000000007000
ArmTrngLib could not be correctly initialized.
InstallProtocolInterface: 3152BCA5-EADE-433D-862E-C01CDC291F44 101FBBE0020
Loading driver B601F8C4-43B7-4784-95B1-F4226CB40CEE


On core without FEAT_RNG:

InstallProtocolInterface: BC62157E-3E33-4FEC-9920-2D3B36D750DF 101FAD68798
ProtectUefiImageCommon - 0xFAD683C0
   - 0x00000101FBBDB000 - 0x0000000000007000
ArmTrngLib could not be correctly initialized.
Error: Image at 101FBBDB000 start failed: 00000001
Loading driver B601F8C4-43B7-4784-95B1-F4226CB40CEE

But it still keeps booting correctly after that? With some missing functionality?

So there is some kind of information but you need to know what
to look for ;(

Ard: would you be opposed to putting a DEBUG print and/or an ASSERT in BaseRngLibContructor if mRndrSupported == 0?

An alternative would be to place a test and noisy warning inside SbsaQemuPlatformDxe.

/
    Leif



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#119737): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/119737
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/106909459/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to