Hi Prabin,

Thank you for this patch.

These changes look good to me.

Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.muja...@arm.com>

Regards,

Sami Mujawar

On 11/03/2024 01:14 pm, Prabin CA wrote:
The reference design platform currently lacks the CPPC (Collaborative
Processor Performance Control) performance limited register as defined
by the ACPI 6.x specification. There is a typo in the macro definition
where the 'fastchannel address of the performance limited register' is
mentioned instead of the 'performance limited register address'.
Correcting this typo. However, it's important to retain the reference to
the performance limited register in the macro for future use, as it will
prove useful once functionalities such as power metering devices are
enabled.

Signed-off-by: Prabin CA <prabin...@arm.com>
---
  Platform/ARM/SgiPkg/Include/SgiAcpiHeader.h | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Platform/ARM/SgiPkg/Include/SgiAcpiHeader.h 
b/Platform/ARM/SgiPkg/Include/SgiAcpiHeader.h
index 033d398fdb63..3e24f569c95a 100644
--- a/Platform/ARM/SgiPkg/Include/SgiAcpiHeader.h
+++ b/Platform/ARM/SgiPkg/Include/SgiAcpiHeader.h
@@ -469,8 +469,7 @@ typedef struct {
@param [in] DesiredPerfReg Fastchannel address for desired performance
                                      register.
-    @param [in] PerfLimitedReg      Fastchannel address for performance limited
-                                    register.
+    @param [in] PerfLimitedReg      Address for performance limited register.
      @param [in] GranularityMHz      Granularity of the performance scale.
      @param [in] HighestPerf         Highest performance in linear scale.
      @param [in] NominalPerf         Nominal performance in linear scale.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#117260): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/117260
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/104862626/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to