The parameters of CreateAmlProcessorContainer() were not
updated in:
commit 5fb3f5723a1e ("DynamicTablesPkg: Allow for specified CPU names")

This causes the EccCheck CI test to fail. Fix this.

Cc: Pierre Gondois <[email protected]>
Cc: Yeo Reum Yun <[email protected]>
Cc: AbdulLateef Attar <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeshua Smith <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Brasen <[email protected]>
Cc: Girish Mahadevan <[email protected]>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <[email protected]>
Cc: Meenakshi Aggarwal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <[email protected]>
---
 .../Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c   | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git 
a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c
 
b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c
index 9e3efb49e630..cc6400e9e0df 100644
--- 
a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c
+++ 
b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c
@@ -980,7 +980,8 @@ CreateAmlCpuFromProcHierarchy (
                                       container node to.
   @param [in]  ProcHierarchyNodeInfo  CM_ARM_PROC_HIERARCHY_INFO object used
                                       to create the node.
-  @param [in]  ProcContainerIndex     Index used to generate the node name.
+  @param [in]  ProcContainerName      Name of the processor container.
+  @param [in]  ProcContainerUid       Uid of the processor container.
   @param [out] ProcContainerNodePtr   If success, contains the created 
processor
                                       container node.
 
-- 
2.25.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#116962): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/116962
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105067965/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to