Sure. Let's start from OVMF. We have leaf enough time for feedback, but I see no comment from other people.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 10:35 PM > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen....@intel.com> > Cc: dougfl...@microsoft.com; Douglas Flick [MSFT] <doug.e...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/6] SECURITY PATCHES TCBZ4117 & > TCBZ4118 > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 01:30:43PM +0000, Yao, Jiewen wrote: > > Gerd > > I have merged this patch set today. > > > > I am fine to remove TPM1.2 in OVMF because of the known security limitation. > > I was thinking about the complete edk2 code base not only OVMF. > > But I can surely start with OVMF. Maybe it is the only platform > affected because on physical hardware you usually know whenever > TPM 1.2 or TPM 2.0 is present so there is no need to include both. > > take care, > Gerd -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#113904): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/113904 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103675434/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
