On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 at 23:35, Oliver Smith-Denny <o...@linux.microsoft.com> wrote: > > Currently, HeapGuard, when in the GuardAlignedToTail mode, assumes that > the pool head has been allocated in the first page of memory that was > allocated. This is not the case for ARM64 platforms when allocating > runtime pools, as RUNTIME_PAGE_ALLOCATION_GRANULARITY is 64k, unlike > X64, which has RUNTIME_PAGE_ALLOCATION_GRANULARITY as 4k. > > When a runtime pool is allocated on ARM64, the minimum number of pages > allocated is 16, to match the runtime granularity. When a small pool is > allocated and GuardAlignedToTail is true, HeapGuard instructs the pool > head to be placed as (MemoryAllocated + EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(Number of Pages) > - SizeRequiredForPool). > > This gives this scenario: > > |Head Guard|Large Free Number of Pages|PoolHead|TailGuard| > > When this pool goes to be freed, HeapGuard instructs the pool code to > free from (PoolHead & ~EFI_PAGE_MASK). However, this assumes that the > PoolHead is in the first page allocated, which as shown above is not true > in this case. For the 4k granularity case (i.e. where the correct number of > pages are allocated for this pool), this logic does work. > > In this failing case, HeapGuard then instructs the pool code to free 16 > (or more depending) pages from the page the pool head was allocated on, > which as seen above means we overrun the pool and attempt to free memory > far past the pool. We end up running into the tail guard and getting an > access flag fault. > > This causes ArmVirtQemu to fail to boot with an access flag fault when > GuardAlignedToTail is set to true (and pool guard enabled for runtime > memory). It should also cause all ARM64 platforms to fail in this > configuration, for exactly the same reason, as this is core code making > the assumption. > > This patch removes HeapGuard's assumption that the pool head is allocated > on the first page and instead undoes the same logic that HeapGuard did > when allocating the pool head in the first place. > > With this patch in place, ArmVirtQemu boots with GuardAlignedToTail > set to true (and when it is false, also). > > BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4521 > Github PR: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/4731 > > Cc: Leif Lindholm <quic_llind...@quicinc.com> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org> > Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.w...@intel.com> > Cc: Liming Gao <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn> > Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan...@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <o...@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks a lot for fixing this - I ran into this a while ago but didn't quite figure out what exactly was going wrong, although the runtime allocation granularity was obviously a factor here. Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <a...@kernel.org> Can we include this in the stable tag please? > --- > MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.h | 7 ++++++- > MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.c | 14 +++++++++++--- > MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.h > b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.h > index 9a32b4dd51d5..24b4206c0e02 100644 > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.h > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.h > @@ -378,12 +378,17 @@ AdjustPoolHeadA ( > Get the page base address according to pool head address. > > @param[in] Memory Head address of pool to free. > + @param[in] NoPages Number of pages actually allocated. > + @param[in] Size Size of memory requested. > + (plus pool head/tail overhead) > > @return Address of pool head. > **/ > VOID * > AdjustPoolHeadF ( > - IN EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Memory > + IN EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Memory, > + IN UINTN NoPages, > + IN UINTN Size > ); > > /** > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.c > b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.c > index 9377f620c5a5..0c0ca61872b4 100644 > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.c > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.c > @@ -1037,12 +1037,17 @@ AdjustPoolHeadA ( > Get the page base address according to pool head address. > > @param[in] Memory Head address of pool to free. > + @param[in] NoPages Number of pages actually allocated. > + @param[in] Size Size of memory requested. > + (plus pool head/tail overhead) > > @return Address of pool head. > **/ > VOID * > AdjustPoolHeadF ( > - IN EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Memory > + IN EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Memory, > + IN UINTN NoPages, > + IN UINTN Size > ) > { > if ((Memory == 0) || ((PcdGet8 (PcdHeapGuardPropertyMask) & BIT7) != 0)) { > @@ -1053,9 +1058,12 @@ AdjustPoolHeadF ( > } > > // > - // Pool head is put near the tail Guard > + // Pool head is put near the tail Guard. We need to exactly undo the > addition done in AdjustPoolHeadA > + // because we may not have allocated the pool head on the first allocated > page, since we are aligned to > + // the tail and on some architectures, the runtime page allocation > granularity is > one page. So we allocate > + // more pages than we need and put the pool head somewhere past the first > page. > // > - return (VOID *)(UINTN)(Memory & ~EFI_PAGE_MASK); > + return (VOID *)(UINTN)(Memory + Size - EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE (NoPages)); > } > > /** > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c > b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c > index b20cbfdedbab..716dd045f9fd 100644 > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c > @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ CoreFreePoolI ( > NoPages = EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (Size) + EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (Granularity) - > 1; > NoPages &= ~(UINTN)(EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (Granularity) - 1); > if (IsGuarded) { > - Head = AdjustPoolHeadF ((EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)(UINTN)Head); > + Head = AdjustPoolHeadF ((EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)(UINTN)Head, NoPages, > Size); > CoreFreePoolPagesWithGuard ( > Pool->MemoryType, > (EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)(UINTN)Head, > -- > 2.40.1 > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#107658): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/107658 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/100652659/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-