I applied the patch and tested it. The UEFI Shell command "acpiview"
reports an error. I enabled the "acpiview" command with the patch:
diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Bhyve/BhyveX64.dsc b/OvmfPkg/Bhyve/BhyveX64.dsc
index d0d2712c5662..0c04e4834cf7 100644
--- a/OvmfPkg/Bhyve/BhyveX64.dsc
+++ b/OvmfPkg/Bhyve/BhyveX64.dsc
@@ -785,6 +785,7 @@ [Components]
NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib.inf
NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellInstall1CommandsLib/UefiShellInstall1CommandsLib.inf
NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellNetwork1CommandsLib/UefiShellNetwork1CommandsLib.inf
+
NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellAcpiViewCommandLib/UefiShellAcpiViewCommandLib.inf
!if $(NETWORK_IP6_ENABLE) == TRUE
NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellNetwork2CommandsLib/UefiShellNetwork2CommandsLib.inf
!endif
The bhyve command I used is:
bhyve -AHP -s 0:0,hostbridge -s 1:0,lpc -s 2:0,virtio-net,tap1 -s
3:0,virtio-blk,./guest.img -s
4:0,ahci-cd,/home/bcran/FreeBSD-14.0-CURRENT-amd64-20230427-60167184abd5-262599-disc1.iso
-c 4 -m 1G -s 29,fbuf,tcp=0.0.0.0:5900,w=1280,h=1024,wait -s
30,xhci,tablet -l
bootrom,/home/bcran/src/uefi/edk2/Build/BhyveX64/DEBUG_GCC5/FV/BHYVE_CODE.fd,/home/bcran/src/uefi/edk2/Build/BhyveX64/DEBUG_GCC5/FV/BHYVE_VARS.fd
-l com1,stdio guest
MADT :
Signature : APIC
Length : 114
Revision : 1
Checksum : 0x66
Oem ID : BHYVE
Oem Table ID : BVAPIC
Oem Revision : 0x1
Creator ID : BASL
Creator Revision : 0x20220504
Local Interrupt Controller Address : 0xFEE00000
Flags : 0x1
PROCESSOR LOCAL APIC :
Type : 0x0
Length : 8
ACPI Processor UID : 0x0
APIC ID : 0x0
Flags : 0x1
Enabled : 1
Online Capable : 0
Reserved : 0
PROCESSOR LOCAL APIC :
Type : 0x0
Length : 8
ACPI Processor UID : 0x1
APIC ID : 0x1
Flags : 0x1
Enabled : 1
Online Capable : 0
Reserved : 0
PROCESSOR LOCAL APIC :
Type : 0x0
Length : 8
ACPI Processor UID : 0x2
APIC ID : 0x2
Flags : 0x1
Enabled : 1
Online Capable : 0
Reserved : 0
PROCESSOR LOCAL APIC :
Type : 0x0
Length : 8
ACPI Processor UID : 0x3
APIC ID : 0x3
Flags : 0x1
Enabled : 1
Online Capable : 0
Reserved : 0
IO APIC :
Type : 0x1
Length : 12
I/O APIC ID : 0x0
Reserved : 0x0
I/O APIC Address : 0xFEC00000
Global System Interrupt Base : 0x0
INTERRUPT SOURCE OVERRIDE :
Type : 0x2
Length : 10
Bus : 0x0
Source : 0x0
Global System Interrupt : 0x2
Flags : 0x5
INTERRUPT SOURCE OVERRIDE :
Type : 0x2
Length : 10
Bus : 0x0
Source : 0x9
Global System Interrupt : 0x9
Flags : 0xF
ERROR: Unknown Interrupt Controller Structure, Type = 4, Length = 6
--
Rebecca Cran
On 4/17/23 05:53, Rebecca Cran wrote:
On 4/17/23 5:46 AM, Corvin Köhne wrote:
+
+/**
+ Get the address of bhyve's ACPI Root System Description Pointer
(RSDP).
+
+ @param RsdpPtr Return pointer to RSDP.
+
+ @return EFI_SUCCESS Bhyve's RSDP successfully found.
+ @return EFI_NOT_FOUND Couldn't find bhyve's RSDP.
+ @return EFI_UNSUPPORTED Revision is lower than 2.
+ @return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR Invalid RSDP found.
I think these should be @retval instead of @return ?
+ if (Rsdp->Revision < 2) {
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: unsupported RSDP found\n",
__FUNCTION__));
You missed converting this __FUNCTION__ to __func__.
+ //
+ // For ACPI 1.0/2.0/3.0 the checksum of first 20 bytes should be 0.
+ // For ACPI 2.0/3.0 the checksum of the entire table should be 0.
+ //
+ UINT8 Sum = CalculateCheckSum8 (
+ (CONST UINT8 *)Rsdp,
+ sizeof
(EFI_ACPI_1_0_ROOT_SYSTEM_DESCRIPTION_POINTER)
+ );
Variables should be declared at the top of the function, and
initialized separately.
+ if (Sum != 0) {
+ DEBUG ((
+ DEBUG_INFO,
+ "%a: RSDP header checksum not valid: 0x%02x\n",
+ __func__,
+ Sum
+ ));
+ return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
+ }
+
+ Sum = CalculateCheckSum8 (
+ (CONST UINT8 *)Rsdp,
+ sizeof (EFI_ACPI_2_0_ROOT_SYSTEM_DESCRIPTION_POINTER)
+ );
+ if (Sum != 0) {
+ DEBUG ((
+ DEBUG_INFO,
+ "%a: RSDP table checksum not valid: 0x%02x\n",
+ __func__,
+ Sum
+ ));
+ return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
+ }
+
+ //
+ // RSDP was found and is valid
+ //
+ *RsdpPtr = Rsdp;
+
+ return EFI_SUCCESS;
+ }
+
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: RSDP not found\n", __func__));
Should these DEBUG_INFO messages which appear to be warnings/errors
use DEBUG_WARN or DEBUG_ERROR, instead?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#103874): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/103874
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/98317333/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-