Hi Rebecca,
It appears that some of the older release of VS2015 do not support
__func__.
Can you please work on a patch that implements the workaround?
Thanks,
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 8:16 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; rebe...@bsdio.com; Gao, Liming
> <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; Liu, Zhiguang <zhiguang....@intel.com>;
> Michael Kubacki <mikub...@linux.microsoft.com>; Sean Brogan
> <sean.bro...@microsoft.com>
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MdePkg: Update code to be more C11
> compliant by using __func__
>
> Hi Rebecca,
>
> For older compilers that do not support __func__, I believe a workaround
> could be added to define __func__ to __FUNCTION__. We do not need to do
> this for any of these patches. It can be something consumers can do if
> they really want to use an older compiler.
>
> You can try it out on VS2012 locally. If it works, then you can mention
> that workaround in the commit message.
>
> Do we have any information on GCC/CLANG compatibility for this feature?
>
> Mike
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Rebecca Cran
> > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 6:32 AM
> > To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io;
> > Gao, Liming <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; Liu, Zhiguang
> > <zhiguang....@intel.com>; Michael Kubacki <mikub...@linux.microsoft.com>;
> > Sean Brogan <sean.bro...@microsoft.com>
> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MdePkg: Update code to be more C11
> > compliant by using __func__
> >
> > (+Michael Kubacki, Sean Brogan)
> >
> > Mike, Michael, Sean:
> >
> >
> > This change is going to break building edk2 with anything older than
> > Visual Studio 2015, which is where support for __func__ was added.
> >
> > I checked and currently it appears that VS2013 builds edk2 but VS2012
> > has errors. Given that the stuart tools don't support anything older
> > than VS2017 I'm thinking this is okay, but I want to double check before
> > pushing this change.
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Rebecca Cran
> >
> >
> > On 3/14/23 2:40 PM, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Rebecca
> > >> Cran
> > >> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 7:20 PM
> > >> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D
> > >> <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>;
> > >> Liu, Zhiguang <zhiguang....@intel.com>
> > >> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MdePkg: Update code to be more C11
> > >> compliant by using __func__
> > >>
> > >> Mike,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I think your concerns with this patch were addressed?
> > >>
> > >> Could you add a Reviewed-by please?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks.
> > >> Rebecca
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 2/9/23 6:01 PM, Michael D Kinney wrote:
> > >>> Hi Rebecca,
> > >>>
> > >>> Did this pass EDK II CI?
> > >>>
> > >>> This change does break EBC compiler builds. The following has to be
> > >>> added to
> > >>> MdePkg/Include/Ebc/ProcessorBind.h in order to use __func__ everywhere.
> > >>>
> > >>> #define __func__ __FUNCTION__
> > >>>
> > >>> I also see __FUNCTION__ used in many packages. I am wondering if we
> > >>> want
> > >>> to do this clean up if it should be its own patch series and update all
> > >>> packages in once series.
> > >>>
> > >>> Mike
> > >>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Rebecca
> > >>>> Cran
> > >>>> Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2023 7:45 AM
> > >>>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D
> > >>>> <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>;
> > >> Liu, Zhiguang
> > >>>> <zhiguang....@intel.com>
> > >>>> Cc: Rebecca Cran <rebe...@quicinc.com>
> > >>>> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MdePkg: Update code to be more C11
> > >>>> compliant by using __func__
> > >>>>
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__ is a pre-standard extension that gcc and Visual C++ among
> > >>>> others support, while __func__ was standardized in C99.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Since it's more standard, replace __FUNCTION__ with __func__ throughout
> > >>>> MdePkg.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran <rebe...@quicinc.com>
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>> MdePkg/Include/Library/PerformanceLib.h
> > >>>> | 12 ++++++------
> > >>>> MdePkg/Include/Library/UnitTestLib.h
> > >>>> | 18 +++++++++------
> > >> ---
> > >>>> MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/LoongArchCache.c
> > >>>> | 6 +++---
> > >>>> MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c
> > >>>> | 12 ++++++------
> > >>>> MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/SafeString.c
> > >>>> | 2 +-
> > >>>>
> > >>>> MdePkg/Library/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib.c
> > >>>> | 4 ++--
> > >>>> MdePkg/Library/DxeRngLib/DxeRngLib.c
> > >>>> | 14 +++++++-------
> > >>>> 7 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Library/PerformanceLib.h
> > >>>> b/MdePkg/Include/Library/PerformanceLib.h
> > >>>> index 34ec956b9c0e..d0f2dfb070d5 100644
> > >>>> --- a/MdePkg/Include/Library/PerformanceLib.h
> > >>>> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Library/PerformanceLib.h
> > >>>> @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ LogPerformanceMeasurement (
> > >>>> #define PERF_EVENT_SIGNAL_BEGIN(EventGuid) \
> > >>>> do { \
> > >>>> if (LogPerformanceMeasurementEnabled (PERF_GENERAL_TYPE)) { \
> > >>>> - LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, EventGuid,
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__ , 0, PERF_EVENTSIGNAL_START_ID); \
> > >>>> + LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, EventGuid,
> > >>>> __func__ , 0, PERF_EVENTSIGNAL_START_ID); \
> > >>>> } \
> > >>>> } while (FALSE)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ LogPerformanceMeasurement (
> > >>>> #define PERF_EVENT_SIGNAL_END(EventGuid) \
> > >>>> do { \
> > >>>> if (LogPerformanceMeasurementEnabled (PERF_GENERAL_TYPE)) { \
> > >>>> - LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, EventGuid,
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__ , 0, PERF_EVENTSIGNAL_END_ID); \
> > >>>> + LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, EventGuid,
> > >>>> __func__ , 0, PERF_EVENTSIGNAL_END_ID); \
> > >>>> } \
> > >>>> } while (FALSE)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ LogPerformanceMeasurement (
> > >>>> #define PERF_CALLBACK_BEGIN(TriggerGuid) \
> > >>>> do { \
> > >>>> if (LogPerformanceMeasurementEnabled (PERF_GENERAL_TYPE)) { \
> > >>>> - LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, TriggerGuid,
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__ , 0, PERF_CALLBACK_START_ID); \
> > >>>> + LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, TriggerGuid,
> > >>>> __func__ , 0, PERF_CALLBACK_START_ID); \
> > >>>> } \
> > >>>> } while (FALSE)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ LogPerformanceMeasurement (
> > >>>> #define PERF_CALLBACK_END(TriggerGuid) \
> > >>>> do { \
> > >>>> if (LogPerformanceMeasurementEnabled (PERF_GENERAL_TYPE)) { \
> > >>>> - LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, TriggerGuid,
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__ , 0, PERF_CALLBACK_END_ID); \
> > >>>> + LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, TriggerGuid,
> > >>>> __func__ , 0, PERF_CALLBACK_END_ID); \
> > >>>> } \
> > >>>> } while (FALSE)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ LogPerformanceMeasurement (
> > >>>> #define PERF_FUNCTION_BEGIN() \
> > >>>> do { \
> > >>>> if (LogPerformanceMeasurementEnabled (PERF_GENERAL_TYPE)) { \
> > >>>> - LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, NULL,
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__ , 0, PERF_FUNCTION_START_ID); \
> > >>>> + LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, NULL, __func__ ,
> > >>>> 0, PERF_FUNCTION_START_ID); \
> > >>>> } \
> > >>>> } while (FALSE)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ LogPerformanceMeasurement (
> > >>>> #define PERF_FUNCTION_END() \
> > >>>> do { \
> > >>>> if (LogPerformanceMeasurementEnabled (PERF_GENERAL_TYPE)) { \
> > >>>> - LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, NULL,
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__ , 0, PERF_FUNCTION_END_ID); \
> > >>>> + LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, NULL, __func__ ,
> > >>>> 0, PERF_FUNCTION_END_ID); \
> > >>>> } \
> > >>>> } while (FALSE)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Library/UnitTestLib.h
> > >>>> b/MdePkg/Include/Library/UnitTestLib.h
> > >>>> index 71c205b1b143..321a310602d7 100644
> > >>>> --- a/MdePkg/Include/Library/UnitTestLib.h
> > >>>> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Library/UnitTestLib.h
> > >>>> @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
> > >>>> @param[in] Expression Expression to be evaluated for TRUE.
> > >>>> **/
> > >>>> #define UT_ASSERT_TRUE(Expression)
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> - if(!UnitTestAssertTrue ((Expression), __FUNCTION__,
> > >>>> DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Expression)) { \
> > >>>> + if(!UnitTestAssertTrue ((Expression), __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER,
> > >>>> __FILE__, #Expression)) { \
> > >>>> return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
> > >>>> @param[in] Expression Expression to be evaluated for FALSE.
> > >>>> **/
> > >>>> #define UT_ASSERT_FALSE(Expression)
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> - if(!UnitTestAssertFalse ((Expression), __FUNCTION__,
> > >>>> DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Expression)) { \
> > >>>> + if(!UnitTestAssertFalse ((Expression), __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER,
> > >>>> __FILE__, #Expression)) { \
> > >>>> return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
> > >>>> @param[in] ValueB Value to be compared for equality (64-bit
> > >>>> comparison).
> > >>>> **/
> > >>>> #define UT_ASSERT_EQUAL(ValueA, ValueB)
> > >> \
> > >>>> - if(!UnitTestAssertEqual ((UINT64)(ValueA), (UINT64)(ValueB),
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__,
> > >> #ValueA, #ValueB)) { \
> > >>>> + if(!UnitTestAssertEqual ((UINT64)(ValueA), (UINT64)(ValueB),
> > >>>> __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #ValueA,
> > >> #ValueB)) { \
> > >>>> return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;
> > >> \
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
> > >>>> @param[in] Length Number of bytes to compare in BufferA and
> > >>>> BufferB.
> > >>>> **/
> > >>>> #define UT_ASSERT_MEM_EQUAL(BufferA, BufferB, Length)
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> - if(!UnitTestAssertMemEqual ((VOID *)(UINTN)(BufferA), (VOID
> > >>>> *)(UINTN)(BufferB), (UINTN)Length, __FUNCTION__,
> > >> DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER,
> > >>>> __FILE__, #BufferA, #BufferB)) { \
> > >>>> + if(!UnitTestAssertMemEqual ((VOID *)(UINTN)(BufferA), (VOID
> > >>>> *)(UINTN)(BufferB), (UINTN)Length, __func__,
> > >> DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER,
> > >>>> __FILE__, #BufferA, #BufferB)) { \
> > >>>> return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
> > >>>> @param[in] ValueB Value to be compared for inequality (64-bit
> > >>>> comparison).
> > >>>> **/
> > >>>> #define UT_ASSERT_NOT_EQUAL(ValueA, ValueB)
> > >> \
> > >>>> - if(!UnitTestAssertNotEqual ((UINT64)(ValueA), (UINT64)(ValueB),
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__,
> > >> #ValueA, #ValueB)) { \
> > >>>> + if(!UnitTestAssertNotEqual ((UINT64)(ValueA), (UINT64)(ValueB),
> > >>>> __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__,
> > >> #ValueA, #ValueB)) { \
> > >>>> return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;
> > >> \
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
> > >>>> @param[in] Status EFI_STATUS value to check.
> > >>>> **/
> > >>>> #define UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR(Status)
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> - if(!UnitTestAssertNotEfiError ((Status), __FUNCTION__,
> > >>>> DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Status)) { \
> > >>>> + if(!UnitTestAssertNotEfiError ((Status), __func__,
> > >>>> DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Status)) { \
> > >>>> return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
> > >>>> @param[in] Expected EFI_STATUS values to compare for equality.
> > >>>> **/
> > >>>> #define UT_ASSERT_STATUS_EQUAL(Status, Expected)
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> - if(!UnitTestAssertStatusEqual ((Status), (Expected), __FUNCTION__,
> > >>>> DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Status)) { \
> > >>>> + if(!UnitTestAssertStatusEqual ((Status), (Expected), __func__,
> > >>>> DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Status)) { \
> > >>>> return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
> > >>>> @param[in] Pointer Pointer to be checked against NULL.
> > >>>> **/
> > >>>> #define UT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(Pointer)
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> - if(!UnitTestAssertNotNull ((Pointer), __FUNCTION__,
> > >>>> DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Pointer)) { \
> > >>>> + if(!UnitTestAssertNotNull ((Pointer), __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER,
> > >>>> __FILE__, #Pointer)) { \
> > >>>> return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ extern BASE_LIBRARY_JUMP_BUFFER
> > >>>> *gUnitTestExpectAssertFailureJumpBuffer;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> if (!UnitTestExpectAssertFailure (
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> UnitTestJumpStatus,
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> - __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__,
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> + __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, \
> > >>>> #FunctionCall, Status)) {
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> }
> > >>>> \
> > >>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/LoongArchCache.c
> > >> b/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/LoongArchCache.c
> > >>>> index 4c8773278c3c..617b0f4218b8 100644
> > >>>> --- a/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/LoongArchCache.c
> > >>>> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/LoongArchCache.c
> > >>>> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ WriteBackInvalidateDataCache (
> > >>>> VOID
> > >>>> )
> > >>>> {
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Not currently implemented on
> > >>>> LoongArch.\n", __FUNCTION__));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Not currently implemented on
> > >>>> LoongArch.\n", __func__));
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> /**
> > >>>> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ WriteBackInvalidateDataCacheRange (
> > >>>> IN UINTN Length
> > >>>> )
> > >>>> {
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Not currently implemented on
> > >>>> LoongArch.\n", __FUNCTION__));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Not currently implemented on
> > >>>> LoongArch.\n", __func__));
> > >>>> return Address;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ WriteBackDataCacheRange (
> > >>>> IN UINTN Length
> > >>>> )
> > >>>> {
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Not currently implemented on
> > >>>> LoongArch.\n", __FUNCTION__));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Not currently implemented on
> > >>>> LoongArch.\n", __func__));
> > >>>> return Address;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c
> > >> b/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c
> > >>>> index 67a3387ff3c6..bb26fe013d8b 100644
> > >>>> --- a/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c
> > >>>> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c
> > >>>> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ InvalidateInstructionCacheRange (
> > >>>> IN UINTN Length
> > >>>> )
> > >>>> {
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n",
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n",
> > >>>> __func__));
> > >>>> return Address;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ WriteBackInvalidateDataCache (
> > >>>> VOID
> > >>>> )
> > >>>> {
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n",
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n",
> > >>>> __func__));
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> /**
> > >>>> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ WriteBackInvalidateDataCacheRange (
> > >>>> IN UINTN Length
> > >>>> )
> > >>>> {
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n",
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n",
> > >>>> __func__));
> > >>>> return Address;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ WriteBackDataCache (
> > >>>> VOID
> > >>>> )
> > >>>> {
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n",
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n",
> > >>>> __func__));
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> /**
> > >>>> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ WriteBackDataCacheRange (
> > >>>> IN UINTN Length
> > >>>> )
> > >>>> {
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n",
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n",
> > >>>> __func__));
> > >>>> return Address;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @@ -245,6 +245,6 @@ InvalidateDataCacheRange (
> > >>>> IN UINTN Length
> > >>>> )
> > >>>> {
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n",
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n",
> > >>>> __func__));
> > >>>> return Address;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/SafeString.c
> > >>>> b/MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/SafeString.c
> > >>>> index b75b33381732..954d3f8c8988 100644
> > >>>> --- a/MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/SafeString.c
> > >>>> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/SafeString.c
> > >>>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> > >>>> if (!(Expression)) { \
> > >>>> DEBUG ((DEBUG_VERBOSE, \
> > >>>> "%a(%d) %a: SAFE_STRING_CONSTRAINT_CHECK(%a) failed.
> > >>>> Return %r\n", \
> > >>>> - __FILE__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FUNCTION__,
> > >>>> DEBUG_EXPRESSION_STRING (Expression), Status)); \
> > >>>> + __FILE__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __func__,
> > >>>> DEBUG_EXPRESSION_STRING (Expression), Status)); \
> > >>>> return Status; \
> > >>>> } \
> > >>>> } while (FALSE)
> > >>>> diff --git
> > >>>> a/MdePkg/Library/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib.c
> > >>>> b/MdePkg/Library/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib.c
> > >>>> index f47301de8982..a23113f9c91d 100644
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>> a/MdePkg/Library/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib.c
> > >>>> +++
> > >>>> b/MdePkg/Library/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib.c
> > >>>> @@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ RedBlackTreeValidate (
> > >>>> CONST RED_BLACK_TREE_NODE *Last;
> > >>>> CONST RED_BLACK_TREE_NODE *Node;
> > >>>>
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_VERBOSE, "%a: Tree=%p\n", __FUNCTION__, Tree));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_VERBOSE, "%a: Tree=%p\n", __func__, Tree));
> > >>>>
> > >>>> //
> > >>>> // property #5
> > >>>> @@ -1459,7 +1459,7 @@ RedBlackTreeValidate (
> > >>>> DEBUG ((
> > >>>> DEBUG_VERBOSE,
> > >>>> "%a: Tree=%p BlackHeight=%Ld Count=%Ld\n",
> > >>>> - __FUNCTION__,
> > >>>> + __func__,
> > >>>> Tree,
> > >>>> (INT64)BlackHeight,
> > >>>> (INT64)ForwardCount
> > >>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/DxeRngLib/DxeRngLib.c
> > >>>> b/MdePkg/Library/DxeRngLib/DxeRngLib.c
> > >>>> index 82129aa44598..46aea515924f 100644
> > >>>> --- a/MdePkg/Library/DxeRngLib/DxeRngLib.c
> > >>>> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/DxeRngLib/DxeRngLib.c
> > >>>> @@ -37,43 +37,43 @@ GenerateRandomNumberViaNist800Algorithm (
> > >>>> RngProtocol = NULL;
> > >>>>
> > >>>> if (Buffer == NULL) {
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Buffer == NULL.\n", __FUNCTION__));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Buffer == NULL.\n", __func__));
> > >>>> return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gEfiRngProtocolGuid, NULL, (VOID
> > >>>> **)&RngProtocol);
> > >>>> if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || (RngProtocol == NULL)) {
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Could not locate RNG prototocol, Status
> > >>>> = %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Could not locate RNG prototocol, Status
> > >>>> = %r\n", __func__, Status));
> > >>>> return Status;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Status = RngProtocol->GetRNG (RngProtocol,
> > >>>> &gEfiRngAlgorithmSp80090Ctr256Guid, BufferSize, Buffer);
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm CTR-256 - Status = %r\n",
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__, Status));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm CTR-256 - Status = %r\n",
> > >>>> __func__, Status));
> > >>>> if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > >>>> return Status;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Status = RngProtocol->GetRNG (RngProtocol,
> > >>>> &gEfiRngAlgorithmSp80090Hmac256Guid, BufferSize, Buffer);
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm HMAC-256 - Status =
> > >>>> %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm HMAC-256 - Status =
> > >>>> %r\n", __func__, Status));
> > >>>> if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > >>>> return Status;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Status = RngProtocol->GetRNG (RngProtocol,
> > >>>> &gEfiRngAlgorithmSp80090Hash256Guid, BufferSize, Buffer);
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm Hash-256 - Status =
> > >>>> %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm Hash-256 - Status =
> > >>>> %r\n", __func__, Status));
> > >>>> if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > >>>> return Status;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> // If all the other methods have failed, use the default method
> > >>>> from the RngProtocol
> > >>>> Status = RngProtocol->GetRNG (RngProtocol, NULL, BufferSize,
> > >>>> Buffer);
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm Hash-256 - Status =
> > >>>> %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm Hash-256 - Status =
> > >>>> %r\n", __func__, Status));
> > >>>> if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > >>>> return Status;
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> // If we get to this point, we have failed
> > >>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: GetRNG() failed, staus = %r\n",
> > >>>> __FUNCTION__, Status));
> > >>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: GetRNG() failed, staus = %r\n", __func__,
> > >>>> Status));
> > >>>>
> > >>>> return Status;
> > >>>> }// GenerateRandomNumberViaNist800Algorithm()
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> 2.30.2
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#101591): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/101591
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/96855618/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe:
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/9847357/21656/1706620634/xyzzy
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
