Hi, > Yeah the SIGILL trapping is a bit nasty, but that is only used if no > implementation of getauxval() exists. > > So perhaps the cleanest way to approach this is to provide a dummy > implementation of getauxval() which only supports AT_HWCAP, and > returns the correct hwcap mask for what the CPU id registers report in > terms for ISA support for crypto extensions. > > I can code that up if you want.
Getting crypto/armcap.c even compile on edk2 will be a challenge I think. So I'd rather exclude it, and add a OPENSSL_cpuid_setup() aarch64 implementation to edk2 and copy over the 10 lines which map HWCAP -> OPENSSL_armcap_P. That'll be alot easier than adding dummy stubs for siglongjmp, sigaction & friends. A hwcap query function would be helpful nevertheless. thanks & take care, Gerd -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#101160): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/101160 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/97576405/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
