Gerd, I also don't think some Pentium processors still use the latest edk2 code. Can you create a bugzilla for the request?
If @Kinney, Michael D doesn't have concern, we can follow up on that old code removal. Thanks, Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 4:49 PM > To: Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com> > Cc: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin...@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Dong, Eric > <eric.d...@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek > <ler...@redhat.com>; Kumar, Rahul R <rahul.r.ku...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v9 0/6] Simplify SMM Relocation Process > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 01:14:33AM +0000, Ni, Ray wrote: > > I expect Gerd at least acknowledges all patches for UefiCpuPkg. Following > three haven't got: > > * [PATCH v9 3/6] UefiCpuPkg/SmmBaseHob.h: Add SMM Base HOB Data > > * [PATCH v9 4/6] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Consume SMM Base > Hob for SmBase info > > * [PATCH v9 5/6] UefiCpuPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: Skip SMBASE > configuration > > I still think it is worth cleaning cleaning up and remove both code and > comment for i486 and pentium processors from the last century. That > should reduce confusion of the already complex code. But if you insist > on not touching the existing code, so be it. > > Series (for post-freeze merge): > Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> > > take care, > Gerd -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#100407): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/100407 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/97001110/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/9847357/21656/1706620634/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
