Le Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 11:40:43PM +0000, Pedro Falcato a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 11:50 AM <tlaro...@polynum.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Ping'ing for this patch sent on November 2022.
> >
> > The patch is trivial. Can someone review it or eventually merge it if OK?
> >
> > TIA,
> > --
> > Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
> > http://www.kergis.com/
> > http://kertex.kergis.com/
> > Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: tlaro...@polynum.com
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Andrew Fish <af...@apple.com>, Ray Ni <ray...@intel.com>, Pedro
> > Falcato <pedro.falc...@gmail.com>
> > Bcc:
> > Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:46:59 +0100
> > Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1 v2] EmulatorPkg: fixes for NetBSD
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Laronde <tlaro...@polynum.com>
> >
> > Fixes for compilation on NetBSD.
> >
> > ---
> > EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> > EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c | 7 +++++--
> > EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h | 7 ++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c
> > b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c
> > index cf2d6b4cda..57b4c8d3be 100644
> > --- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c
> > +++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/BlockIo.c
> > @@ -133,6 +133,20 @@ EmuBlockIoOpenDevice (
> >
> > ioctl (Private->fd, DKIOCGETMAXBLOCKCOUNTWRITE,
> > &Private->Media->OptimalTransferLengthGranularity);
> > }
> > + #elif _NETBSD_SOURCE
> > + {
> > + UINTN BlockSize;
> > + off_t DiskSize;
> > +
> > + if (ioctl (Private->fd, DIOCGSECTORSIZE, &BlockSize) == 0) {
> > + Private->Media->BlockSize = BlockSize;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (ioctl (Private->fd, DIOCGMEDIASIZE, &DiskSize) == 0) {
> > + Private->NumberOfBlocks = DivU64x32 (DiskSize,
> > (UINT32)BlockSize);
> > + Private->Media->LastBlock = Private->NumberOfBlocks - 1;
> > + }
> > + }
> > #else
> > {
> > size_t BlockSize;
> > @@ -154,7 +168,7 @@ EmuBlockIoOpenDevice (
> > Private->Media->LastBlock = Private->NumberOfBlocks - 1;
> >
> > if (fstatfs (Private->fd, &buf) == 0) {
> > - #if __APPLE__
> > + #if __APPLE__ || _NETBSD_SOURCE
> >
> Isn't this the wrong test? Shouldn't you test for __NetBSD__ instead? AIUI
> _NETBSD_SOURCE is just a feature test macro like _GNU_SOURCE, right?
You're right: I was focusing on "not POSIXly defined" and grapping to a
featuretest macro at the same level. __NetBSD__ will do.
>
> > Private->Media->OptimalTransferLengthGranularity =
> > buf.f_iosize/buf.f_bsize;
> > #else
> > Private->Media->OptimalTransferLengthGranularity =
> > buf.f_bsize/buf.f_bsize;
> > diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c
> > index 38c01c84af..1700a4b60f 100644
> > --- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c
> > +++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> > #define MAP_ANONYMOUS MAP_ANON
> > #endif
> >
> > +#define MAP_ANON_FD_ (-1)
> >
> Again, I don't think you need a define for this. At most you could just
> stick a -1 down there with a comment like:
> // We're required to pass -1 for anonymous mappings on BSD-like systems
>
OK. I will suppress the macro and go to a comment.
> > +
> > //
> > // Globals
> > //
> > @@ -187,7 +189,7 @@ main (
> > //
> > InitialStackMemorySize = STACK_SIZE;
> > InitialStackMemory = (UINTN)MapMemory (
> > - 0,
> > + MAP_ANON_FD_,
> > (UINT32)InitialStackMemorySize,
> > PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
> > MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE
> > @@ -348,6 +350,7 @@ MapMemory (
> > while ((!isAligned) && (base != 0)) {
> > res = mmap ((void *)base, length, prot, flags, fd, 0);
> > if (res == MAP_FAILED) {
> > + perror("MapMemory");
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -640,7 +643,7 @@ SecUnixPeiAutoScan (
> >
> > *MemoryBase = 0;
> > res = MapMemory (
> > - 0,
> > + MAP_ANON_FD_,
> > gSystemMemory[Index].Size,
> > PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
> > MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS
> > diff --git a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h
> > index 0c81cdfc01..0de925adaf 100644
> > --- a/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h
> > +++ b/EmulatorPkg/Unix/Host/Host.h
> > @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> >
> > #if __CYGWIN__
> > #include <sys/dirent.h>
> > +#elif _NETBSD_SOURCE
> >
> Same as above.
>
> > + #include <dirent.h>
> > #else
> > #include <sys/dir.h>
> > #endif
> > @@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> > #include <net/if.h>
> > #include <ifaddrs.h>
> >
> > -#ifdef __APPLE__
> > +#if defined(__APPLE__)
> >
> #include <net/if_dl.h>
> > #include <net/bpf.h>
> > #include <sys/param.h>
> > @@ -65,6 +67,9 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> > #ifndef _Bool
> > #define _Bool char // for clang debug
> > #endif
> > +#elif defined(_NETBSD_SOURCE)
> > + #define statfs statvfs
> > + #define fstatfs fstatvfs
> > #else
> > #include <termio.h>
> > #include <sys/vfs.h>
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> I can give you my Ack or RB after this, but FWIW I'm not a maintainer for
> EmulatorPkg so you'll still need appropriate reviews from the package
> mainainers.
OK. Thanks! I will prepare a v3 and let the maintainers decide.
Best,
--
Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
http://www.kergis.com/
http://kertex.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#98133): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/98133
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/96070144/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
