[AMD Official Use Only - General]

Sure Mike, I had CC IPMI owners to review edk2 IPMI related patch sets.
This change doesn't have a big impact on edk2-platforms because all the 
references of IpmiCommandLib under edk2-platfoms are in IpmiFeaturePkg itself. 
The old IpmiCommandLib.h will be still under IpmiFeaturePkg/include for now, 
but the definitions of new functions should be added
to the one under MdeModulePkg. However the edk2-platorms one should be removed 
soon (it is better) or later (means the IpmiFeaturePkg re-architecture, email 
attached).

IPMI is the industry standard however the implementation of API for each NetFn 
is not, this is the first consideration I had. Second, there is already a 
IpmiLib under MdeModulePkg that led me to create IpmiCommandLib under 
MdeModulePkg. 
BTW, there is problem we have to fix, IpmiLib provide the function to 
send/receive IPMI NetFn, while the same function provided by IpmiFeaturePkg 
under edk2-platform has the different library class naming, which is 
IpmiBaseLib.

Thanks
Abner

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2022 1:32 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Chang, Abner <abner.ch...@amd.com>; Kinney,
> Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.w...@intel.com>; Gao, Liming
> <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; Nickle Wang <nick...@nvidia.com>; Igor
> Kulchytskyy <ig...@ami.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.o...@intel.com>;
> Desimone, Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desim...@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael
> D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Add NULL IpmiCommandLib instance
> 
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper
> caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
> 
> 
> Hi Abner,
> 
> Since this is moving content from edk2-platforms to edk2, we need to make
> sure that migration is coordinated with the edk2-platforms owners for the
> IPMPI feature and we have a transition plan for all downstream platform DSC
> files to use the content from the new location.  These types of changes can
> be very disruptive.
> 
> Also, since IPMI is an industry standard, it is allowed to add libraries that
> support industry standards to the MdePkg.  How was MdeModulePkg
> selected vs MdePkg?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Chang,
> > Abner via groups.io
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2022 8:59 PM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.w...@intel.com>; Gao, Liming
> > <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; Nickle Wang <nick...@nvidia.com>; Igor
> > Kulchytskyy <ig...@ami.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.o...@intel.com>;
> > Desimone, Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desim...@intel.com>
> > Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Add NULL IpmiCommandLib instance
> >
> > From: Abner Chang <abner.ch...@amd.com>
> >
> > BZ# 4231
> > This patch adds a NULL instance of IpmiCommandLib to remove the
> > dependence between edk2 and edk2-platform packages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abner Chang <abner.ch...@amd.com>
> > Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.w...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Liming Gao <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>
> > Cc: Nickle Wang <nick...@nvidia.com>
> > Cc: Igor Kulchytskyy <ig...@ami.com>
> > Cc: Isaac Oram <isaac.w.o...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desim...@intel.com>
> >
> > Abner Chang (3):
> >   MdeModulePkg/Include: Add IpmiCommandLib header file
> >   MdeModulePkg/IpmiCommandLib: Add NULL instance library
> >   MdeModulePkg: Add IpmiCommandLib
> >
> >  MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec                 |   4 +
> >  MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dsc                 |   2 +
> >  .../BaseIpmiCommandLibNull.inf                |  32 +
> >  MdeModulePkg/Include/Library/IpmiCommandLib.h | 683
> ++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../IpmiCommandLibNetFnApp.c                  | 252 +++++++
> >  .../IpmiCommandLibNetFnChassis.c              | 123 ++++
> >  .../IpmiCommandLibNetFnStorage.c              | 248 +++++++
> >  .../IpmiCommandLibNetFnTransport.c            | 100 +++
> >  8 files changed, 1444 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644
> >
> MdeModulePkg/Library/BaseIpmiCommandLibNull/BaseIpmiCommandLibN
> ull.inf
> >  create mode 100644 MdeModulePkg/Include/Library/IpmiCommandLib.h
> >  create mode 100644
> >
> MdeModulePkg/Library/BaseIpmiCommandLibNull/IpmiCommandLibNetFn
> App.c
> >  create mode 100644
> >
> MdeModulePkg/Library/BaseIpmiCommandLibNull/IpmiCommandLibNetFn
> Chassis
> > .c  create mode 100644
> >
> MdeModulePkg/Library/BaseIpmiCommandLibNull/IpmiCommandLibNetFnS
> torage
> > .c  create mode 100644
> >
> MdeModulePkg/Library/BaseIpmiCommandLibNull/IpmiCommandLibNetFnT
> ranspo
> > rt.c
> >
> > --
> > 2.37.1.windows.1
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#97821): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/97821
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95915689/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


--- Begin Message ---
[AMD Official Use Only - General]



Thanks and sure, I will kick off the discussion on the mailing list.



Regards,

Abner



From: Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.o...@intel.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2022 4:34 AM
To: Chang, Abner <abner.ch...@amd.com>; Gao, Liming <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; 
Desimone, Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desim...@intel.com>
Cc: nick...@nvidia.com; Attar, AbdulLateef (Abdul Lateef) 
<abdullateef.at...@amd.com>
Subject: RE: Propose the ManageabilityPkg under edk2-platform/Features



        Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper 
caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.



Abner,



>From my perspective, this looks reasonable.  I think that we need to have the 
>actual discussion on the mailing list so that our various customers can weigh 
>in on the design and implementation.



Regards,

Isaac





From: Chang, Abner <abner.ch...@amd.com<mailto:abner.ch...@amd.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 11:08 PM
To: Gao, Liming <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn<mailto:gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>>; 
Desimone, Nathaniel L 
<nathaniel.l.desim...@intel.com<mailto:nathaniel.l.desim...@intel.com>>; Oram, 
Isaac W <isaac.w.o...@intel.com<mailto:isaac.w.o...@intel.com>>
Cc: nick...@nvidia.com<mailto:nick...@nvidia.com>; Attar, AbdulLateef (Abdul 
Lateef) <abdullateef.at...@amd.com<mailto:abdullateef.at...@amd.com>>
Subject: Propose the ManageabilityPkg under edk2-platform/Features



[AMD Official Use Only - General]



Hi Liming, Nate and Isaac,

This is Abner from AMD. I am writing to let you know that Nvidia and AMD is 
going propose a new package ManageabilityPkg under edk2-platforms/Features. We 
would like to provide the Feature driver, Protocol driver instance and 
transport implementation that includes PLDM, MCTP, IPMI and KCS industry 
standard under ManageabilityPkg for the server management. The concept of this 
package is to provide the driver stacks as shown in the below drafting,







We may also pull IpmiFeaturePkg out of Intel/OutOfBandManagement folder. Thus 
the IpmiFeaturePkg can be referred by the edk2 driver (e.g., Modules under 
RedfishPkg) without the Intel folder in the INF package section or add 
edk2-platforms/Feature/Intel to the PACKAGES_PATH (add edk2-platform to 
packages path is required) for the build. We will take care the backward 
compatibility issues of IpmiFeaturePkg relocation, however can only cover the 
issues in the scope of edk2-platform.



How do you think?



Thanks and Regards,

Abner




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
[AMD Official Use Only - General]


Hi all,

In order to having the full edk2 driver stack for the server manageability, we 
are going to propose a new package ManageabilityPkg under 
edk2-platforms/Features. We would like to have a package that can provide a 
simple framework to flexibly accommodate the manageability feature driver (e.g. 
PLDM, IPMI, Redfish), Protocol driver instance (e.g. MCTP) and transport 
implementation (e.g. KCS/I2C/PCIe VDM) for the server management. Below are the 
steps we would take for this work,

1.      The first step we would take is to move IpmiFeaturePkg out of 
edk2-platforms/Features/Intel/OutOfBandManagement/. Thus the IpmiFeaturePkg can 
be referred by the edk2 driver (e.g., Modules under RedfishPkg) without the 
Intel folder in the INF package section or add edk2-platforms/Features/Intel to 
the PACKAGES_PATH for the build (add edk2-platforms/Features to packages path 
is still required). We will take care of the backward compatibility issues of 
IpmiFeaturePkg relocation, however we can only cover the build issues in the 
scope of edk2-platforms repo.
2.      After this we will abstract the transport implementation from  IPMI 
Transport protocol, so the IPMI protocol can flexibly  incorporate with other 
transport implementations.
3.      Add IPMI feature driver/library (e.g. IPMI Redfish bootstrap account 
Credential)
4.      Add MCTP and PLDM driver stack with the same concept as IpmiFeaturePkg



Any recommendations to this work?

Thanks

Abner








--- End Message ---

Reply via email to