Hi Jiewen, Thanks for your information. I will follow the process.
Joey Lee On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 08:46:04AM +0000, Yao, Jiewen wrote: > Hi Joey > You are welcome. Thanks to catch the issue and provide the patch. > > One thing to clarify: The patch submitter is expected to pass CI, *before* > submit the patch. > > The benefit is that: If the patch passes the review, the maintainer may merge > it directly. > > There is no need to trigger another round CI-fix, V2 patch submission and > review. > > Thank you > Yao, Jiewen > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: joeyli <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 3:10 PM > > To: [email protected]; Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]> > > Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi <[email protected]>; Xu, Min M > > <[email protected]>; Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>; Tom > > Lendacky <[email protected]>; James Bottomley > > <[email protected]>; Aktas, Erdem <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: Fix integrity > > checking failed of NvVarStore in some cases > > > > Hi Jiewen, > > > > Sorry for I didn't create tiano CI on github in time. And thanks for your > > help to merge my patch. > > > > I will create tiano CI in next time after getting our Review-by tag. > > > > Thanks! > > Joey Lee > > > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 03:17:42AM +0000, Yao, Jiewen via groups.io wrote: > > > Thanks for the fix. > > > Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <[email protected]> > > > > > > Question: Have you run tiano CI by yourself, before submit the patch? > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Lee, Chun-Yi <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2022 10:27 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Cc: Xu, Min M <[email protected]>; Gerd Hoffmann > > > > <[email protected]>; Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]>; Tom > > Lendacky > > > > <[email protected]>; James Bottomley <[email protected]>; > > > > Aktas, Erdem <[email protected]>; Lee, Chun-Yi <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: [PATCH v2] OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: Fix integrity checking > > > > failed > > of > > > > NvVarStore in some cases > > > > > > > > In the commit 4f173db8b4 "OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: Add functions for > > > > EmuVariableNvStore", it introduced a PlatformValidateNvVarStore() > > function > > > > for checking the integrity of NvVarStore. > > > > > > > > In some cases when the VariableHeader->StartId is VARIABLE_DATA, the > > > > VariableHeader->State is not just one of the four primary states: > > > > VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION, VAR_DELETED, > > VAR_HEADER_VALID_ONLY, > > > > VAR_ADDED. > > > > The state may combined two or three states, e.g. > > > > > > > > 0x3C = (VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION & VAR_ADDED) & > > VAR_DELETED > > > > or > > > > 0x3D = VAR_ADDED & VAR_DELETED > > > > > > > > When the variable store has those variables, system booting/rebooting > > will > > > > hangs in a ASSERT: > > > > > > > > NvVarStore Variable header State was invalid. > > > > ASSERT > > > > /mnt/working/source_code- > > > > git/edk2/OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformInitLib/Platform.c(819): > > > > ((BOOLEAN)(0==1)) > > > > > > > > Adding more log to UpdateVariable() and PlatformValidateNvVarStore(), > > we > > > > saw some variables which have 0x3C or 0x3D state in store. > > > > e.g. > > > > > > > > UpdateVariable(), VariableName=BootOrder > > > > L1871, State=0000003F <-- VAR_ADDED > > > > State &= VAR_DELETED=0000003D > > > > FlushHobVariableToFlash(), VariableName=BootOrder > > > > ... > > > > UpdateVariable(), VariableName=InitialAttemptOrder > > > > L1977, State=0000003F > > > > State &= VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION=0000003E > > > > L2376, State=0000003E > > > > State &= VAR_DELETED=0000003C > > > > FlushHobVariableToFlash(), VariableName=InitialAttemptOrder > > > > ... > > > > UpdateVariable(), VariableName=ConIn > > > > L1977, State=0000003F > > > > State &= VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION=0000003E > > > > L2376, State=0000003E > > > > State &= VAR_DELETED=0000003C > > > > FlushHobVariableToFlash(), VariableName=ConIn > > > > ... > > > > > > > > So, only allowing the four primary states is not enough. This patch > > changes > > > > the falid states list (Follow Jiewen Yao's suggestion): > > > > > > > > 1. VAR_HEADER_VALID_ONLY (0x7F) > > > > - Header added (*) > > > > 2. VAR_ADDED (0x3F) > > > > - Header + data added > > > > 3. VAR_ADDED & VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION (0x3E) > > > > - marked as deleted, but still valid, before new data is added. > > > > (*) > > > > 4. VAR_ADDED & VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION & VAR_DELETED (0x3C) > > > > - deleted, after new data is added. > > > > 5. VAR_ADDED & VAR_DELETED (0x3D) > > > > - deleted directly, without new data. > > > > (*) means to support surprise shutdown. > > > > > > > > And removed (VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION) and (VAR_DELETED) > > because > > > > they are > > > > invalid states. > > > > > > > > v2: > > > > Follow Jiewen Yao's suggestion to add the following valid states: > > > > VAR_ADDED & VAR_DELETED (0x3D) > > > > VAR_ADDED & VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION (0x3E) > > > > VAR_ADDED & VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION & VAR_DELETED > > > > (0x3C) > > > > and removed the following invalid states: > > > > VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION > > > > VAR_DELETED > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformInitLib/Platform.c | 9 +++++---- > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformInitLib/Platform.c > > > > b/OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformInitLib/Platform.c > > > > index 77f22de046..6963c47e0b 100644 > > > > --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformInitLib/Platform.c > > > > +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformInitLib/Platform.c > > > > @@ -702,10 +702,11 @@ PlatformValidateNvVarStore ( > > > > > > > > VariableOffset = NvVarStoreHeader->Size - sizeof > > > > (VARIABLE_STORE_HEADER); > > > > } else { > > > > - if (!((VariableHeader->State == VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION) || > > > > - (VariableHeader->State == VAR_DELETED) || > > > > - (VariableHeader->State == VAR_HEADER_VALID_ONLY) || > > > > - (VariableHeader->State == VAR_ADDED))) > > > > + if (!((VariableHeader->State == VAR_HEADER_VALID_ONLY) || > > > > + (VariableHeader->State == VAR_ADDED) || > > > > + (VariableHeader->State == (VAR_ADDED & VAR_DELETED)) || > > > > + (VariableHeader->State == (VAR_ADDED & > > > > VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION)) || > > > > + (VariableHeader->State == (VAR_ADDED & > > > > VAR_IN_DELETED_TRANSITION & VAR_DELETED)))) > > > > { > > > > DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "NvVarStore Variable header State was > > > > invalid.\n")); > > > > return FALSE; > > > > -- > > > > 2.35.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#97727): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/97727 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95724215/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
