Hello Jeff, The Lpi version should effectively be 0: Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gond...@arm.com>
Regards, Pierre On 11/15/22 19:01, Jeff Brasen wrote:
_LPI Revision should be 0 per the ACPI 6.5 specification. "The revision number of the _LPI object. Current revision is 0." Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbra...@nvidia.com> --- .../Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c index d06c7615fb..91199c4af2 100644 --- a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c +++ b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ GenerateLpiStates ( }// We do not support the LevelId field for now, let it to 0.- Status = AmlCreateLpiNode (AslName, 1, 0, ScopeNode, &LpiNode); + Status = AmlCreateLpiNode (AslName, 0, 0, ScopeNode, &LpiNode); if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) { ASSERT (0); return Status;
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#96489): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/96489 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95048993/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
