I think we should avoid the expectation that we are in a container if and only if we are using GCC5. Instead I would prefer we add a boolean parameter to allows us to explicitly use the included python. So instead of the GCC check we would have this.

    condition: not(eq('${{ parameters.useIncludedPython }}', 'true'))

Chris Fernald
Microsoft

On 9/20/2022 7:45 AM, Oliver Steffen wrote:
Use the Python supplied by the container image.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Steffen <ostef...@redhat.com>
---
  .azurepipelines/templates/platform-build-run-steps.yml | 1 +
  .azurepipelines/templates/pr-gate-steps.yml            | 1 +
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/.azurepipelines/templates/platform-build-run-steps.yml 
b/.azurepipelines/templates/platform-build-run-steps.yml
index 40a31a509fc5..3c16fa981d5a 100644
--- a/.azurepipelines/templates/platform-build-run-steps.yml
+++ b/.azurepipelines/templates/platform-build-run-steps.yml
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ steps:
    inputs:
      versionSpec: ">=3.10.6"
      architecture: "x64"
+  condition: not(eq('${{ parameters.tool_chain_tag }}', 'GCC5'))
- script: pip install -r pip-requirements.txt --upgrade
    displayName: 'Install/Upgrade pip modules'
diff --git a/.azurepipelines/templates/pr-gate-steps.yml 
b/.azurepipelines/templates/pr-gate-steps.yml
index cb431e53fcd1..df8802718d99 100644
--- a/.azurepipelines/templates/pr-gate-steps.yml
+++ b/.azurepipelines/templates/pr-gate-steps.yml
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ steps:
    inputs:
      versionSpec: '>=3.10.6'
      architecture: 'x64'
+  condition: not(eq('${{ parameters.tool_chain_tag }}', 'GCC5'))
- script: pip install -r pip-requirements.txt --upgrade
    displayName: 'Install/Upgrade pip modules'


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#94062): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/94062
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93805165/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to