Hi, May I suggest you just port the bare rust language (no crates, no std) to EDK2? It seems far more plausible to expect people to use a cut down version with some bindings to the rest of the project instead of hoping people just use the whole of rust, a lot of which isnt proven (or even used AFAIK) in bare metal projects. Porting just the bare minimum is way more realistic in my opinion.
Thanks, Pedro On Mon, 1 Aug 2022, 18:02 Ayush Singh, <ayushdevel1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone. In the previous email thread [1], I discussed the > proposal to move Rust std work to edk2-staging and mentioned its > potential problems. After some discussion with mentors, we arrived at > the conclusion to have a rustlang [2] fork under the Tianocore > organization, and move all the std related work there. We can then open > a PR upstream from there, while allowing PRs in this repository. This > should help provide an easier and streamlined way for people to > experiment and work on this project while it is in the process of being > merged upstream. > > > For a status update about tests: > > - passed: 12797 > > - failed: 40 > > - ignored: 375 > > > Yours Sincerely, > > Ayush Singh > > > [1]: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/91989 > > [2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#92020): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/92020 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/92752888/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
