Hello everyone, the project has now reached the stage where it is
possible to build for UEFI just like an std supporting Rust target.
However, running tests is where it gets a bit tricky:

While there are some rust targets that run on QEMU emulation for
testing [1] (as opposed to just docker), this is currently achieved by
2 tools: remote-test-client [2] and remote-test-server [3] which are
programs for sending test programs and libraries to the emulator, and
running the tests within the emulator, and reading the results.

This means that the rust-test-server [3] needs to run in the UEFI
environment. This means it needs the `sys::net` module implemented. As
suggested in the last meeting, I was using a dummy implementation of
net. However, for using the current Rust testing environment, we
simply need to implement net.

There is also the alternative of using stdio in qemu for testing, but
that will mean significant reworking of the Rust testing framework
(which seems to be more difficult than implementing `net`)

So I think that it would be better to implement the `net` module
first. The primitives that need to be implemented in this module are
TcpSocket, TcpListener, and UdpSocket (unsupported version link [4]).

So should I go ahead with implementing `net`? Is there anything
special that I should consider?

Yours Sincerely,
Ayush Singh

[1]: 
https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/tests/running.html#testing-on-emulators
[2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/src/tools/remote-test-client
[3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/src/tools/remote-test-server
[4]: 
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/5b9775fe17893cba641a071de7e0a7c8f478c41b/library/std/src/sys/unsupported/net.rs


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#91006): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/91006
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/92117896/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to