Min:
  This failure is introduced by the commit 
b22ac35b754d1a071e0b40adc47f7c53c3d77893 OvmfPkg: Update PlatformInitLib to 
process Tdx hoblist from you. Can you provide the hot fix for this stable tag 
202205? This stable tag will be released on tomorrow.

lld-link: error: undefined symbol: memcpy
>>> referenced by 
>>> e:\code\edk2github\OvmfPkg\Library\PlatformInitLib\IntelTdx.c:191
>>>               PlatformInitLib.lib(IntelTdx.obj):(ValidateHobList)

Thanks
Liming
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> 代表 Rebecca Cran
> 发送时间: 2022年5月26日 9:27
> 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; theojeh...@gmail.com
> 抄送: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org>; Jiewen Yao
> <jiewen....@intel.com>; Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; Gerd
> Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
> 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2] [PATCH v1 1/1] OvmfPkg/TdxDxe: Remove
> AsmRelocateApMailBoxLoopStart prefix at call
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rebecca Cran <quic_rc...@quicinc.com>
> Tested-by: Rebecca Cran <quic_rc...@quicinc.com>
> 
> This lets the build get further, before it runs into Availability.h not
> being found.
> 
> If I download
> http://opensource.apple.com/source/CarbonHeaders/CarbonHeaders-18.1/A
> vailability.h
> and
> http://opensource.apple.com/source/CarbonHeaders/CarbonHeaders-18.1/A
> vailabilityInternal.h
> into MdePkg/Include
> (which is very much a hack) then the DEBUG and RELEASE builds succeed.
> 
> However, NOOPT fails with code generating a call to _memcpy:
> 
> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
>    "_memcpy", referenced from:
>        _ValidateHobList in PlatformInitLib.lib(IntelTdx.obj)
> ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
> "libtool" -static -o
> /Users/bcran/src/uefi/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_XCODE5/X64/MdeModu
> lePkg/Universal/CapsuleRuntimeDxe/CapsuleRuntimeDxe/OUTPUT/CapsuleR
> untimeDxe.lib
> -filelist
> /Users/bcran/src/uefi/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_XCODE5/X64/MdeModu
> lePkg/Universal/CapsuleRuntimeDxe/CapsuleRuntimeDxe/OUTPUT/object_fil
> es.lst
> make: ***
> [/Users/bcran/src/uefi/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_XCODE5/X64/OvmfPkg
> /Sec/SecMain/DEBUG/SecMain.dll]
> Error 1
> 
> 
> build.py...
>   : error 7000: Failed to execute command
>      make tbuild
> [/Users/bcran/src/uefi/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_XCODE5/X64/OvmfPkg
> /Sec/SecMain]
> 
> 
> build.py...
>   : error F002: Failed to build module
>      /Users/bcran/src/uefi/edk2/OvmfPkg/Sec/SecMain.inf [X64, XCODE5,
> NOOPT]
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/25/22 17:54, Théo Jehl wrote:
> > From: Theo Jehl <theojeh...@gmail.com>
> >
> > Removed prefix to match AsmRelocateApMailBoxLoopStart declaration.
> > This fixes a compilation issue.
> >
> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen....@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jehl Theo <theojeh...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   OvmfPkg/TdxDxe/X64/ApRunLoop.nasm | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/TdxDxe/X64/ApRunLoop.nasm
> b/OvmfPkg/TdxDxe/X64/ApRunLoop.nasm
> > index a859375fb819..52fb3b4944bf 100644
> > --- a/OvmfPkg/TdxDxe/X64/ApRunLoop.nasm
> > +++ b/OvmfPkg/TdxDxe/X64/ApRunLoop.nasm
> > @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ AsmRelocateApMailBoxLoopEnd:
> >   
> > ;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >   global ASM_PFX(AsmGetRelocationMap)
> >   ASM_PFX(AsmGetRelocationMap):
> > -    lea        rax, [ASM_PFX(AsmRelocateApMailBoxLoopStart)]
> > +    lea        rax, [AsmRelocateApMailBoxLoopStart]
> >       mov        qword [rcx], rax
> >       mov        qword [rcx +  8h], AsmRelocateApMailBoxLoopEnd -
> AsmRelocateApMailBoxLoopStart
> >       ret
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#90038): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/90038
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/91350493/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to