Hi Barton,

As our discussion in today's edk2-test bug triage meeting, my second point " 
UEFI spec implies that the ReadKeyStrokeEx should clear KeyState (set the value 
to zero) if there is no key data" is not clear enough. Sorry about that.

To be clear, UEFI spec says the following:
 -  UEFI drivers which implement the  EFI_SIMPLE_TEXT_INPUT_EX protocol are 
required to return KeyData.Key  and  KeyData.KeyState values. These drivers 
must always return the most current state of KeyData.KeyState.KeyShiftState and 
 KeyData.KeyState.KeyToggleState.
However, when user doesn't press any key, there will be no most current state 
to return. For solving thie problems, @Ruiyu Ni (In Cc) has patch series 
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/20311 and commit message below:
 - Today's implementation only return key state when there is a key.But when 
user doesn't press any key, the key state cannot be returned.The patch changes 
the ReadKeyStrokeEx() to always return the key state even there is no key 
pressed.

Therefore, this is just preferred implementation rather than a requirement in 
spec.

Best Regards,
Sunny
-----Original Message-----
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Sunny Wang via 
groups.io
Sent: 03 March 2022 17:28
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; gao...@byosoft.com.cn
Cc: G Edhaya Chandran <edhaya.chand...@arm.com>; carolyn.gjert...@amd.com; 
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <samer.el-haj-mahm...@arm.com>; eric....@intel.com; 
arvinx.c...@intel.com; supreeth.venkat...@amd.com; Sunny Wang 
<sunny.w...@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] uefi-sct/SctPkg:Enhance 
BBTestReadKeyStrokeExFunctionAutoTestCheckpoint1()

Sorry for the late review.

The change looks fine. However, I'm confused about the comment " Log the error 
here and return key states are not supported when high order bit of 
KeyToggleState is 0 or KeyState not touched". It looks like returning 
EFI_UNSUPPORTED won't log any error/failure in the result log. Did I overlook 
anything here?

Furthermore, it looks like UEFI spec implies that the ReadKeyStrokeEx should 
clear KeyState (set the value to zero) if there is no key data. There is also a 
code change for doing this in edk2. https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/20311
Therefore, if I didn't overlook anything here, we should separately deal with 
the "(Key.KeyState.KeyShiftState == 0xFFFFFFFF) || (Key.KeyState.KeyToggleState 
== 0xFF)" as a failure rather than directly returning EFI_UNSUPPORTED.

Barton and Edhaya, what do you guys think?

Best Regards,
Sunny
-----Original Message-----
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Gao Jie via 
groups.io
Sent: 24 November 2021 03:16
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: G Edhaya Chandran <edhaya.chand...@arm.com>; carolyn.gjert...@amd.com; 
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <samer.el-haj-mahm...@arm.com>; eric....@intel.com; 
arvinx.c...@intel.com; supreeth.venkat...@amd.com
Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] uefi-sct/SctPkg:Enhance 
BBTestReadKeyStrokeExFunctionAutoTestCheckpoint1()

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2386

Enhance BBTestReadKeyStrokeExFunctionAutoTestCheckpoint1()
to handle ReadKeyStrokeEx implementation which returns EFI_NOT_READY
but without touching KeyToggleState.

Signed-off-by: Barton Gao <gao...@byosoft.com.cn>
---
 .../BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestFunction.c    | 11 ++++++++++-
 .../BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestFunction.c    | 11 ++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git 
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestFunction.c
 
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestFunction.c
index 0398bc26..c1669959 100644
--- 
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestFunction.c
+++ 
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestFunction.c
@@ -1160,6 +1160,12 @@ BBTestReadKeyStrokeExFunctionAutoTestCheckpoint1 (
   ValidState[5] = EFI_TOGGLE_STATE_VALID | EFI_KEY_STATE_EXPOSED | 
EFI_NUM_LOCK_ACTIVE | EFI_CAPS_LOCK_ACTIVE;
   ValidState[6] = EFI_TOGGLE_STATE_VALID | EFI_KEY_STATE_EXPOSED | 
EFI_SCROLL_LOCK_ACTIVE |EFI_NUM_LOCK_ACTIVE | EFI_CAPS_LOCK_ACTIVE;

+  //
+  // Set all bits to one (invalid values) for both KeyShiftState and 
KeyToggleState
+  //
+  Key.KeyState.KeyShiftState = 0xFFFFFFFF;
+  Key.KeyState.KeyToggleState = 0xFF;
+
   //
   //Read next keystroke from the input device
   //
@@ -1171,7 +1177,10 @@ BBTestReadKeyStrokeExFunctionAutoTestCheckpoint1 (
     return Status;
   }

-  if ((Key.KeyState.KeyToggleState & EFI_TOGGLE_STATE_VALID) == 0) {
+  if (((Key.KeyState.KeyToggleState & EFI_TOGGLE_STATE_VALID) == 0) || 
(Key.KeyState.KeyShiftState == 0xFFFFFFFF) || (Key.KeyState.KeyToggleState == 
0xFF)) {
+    //
+    // Log the error here and return key states are not supported when high 
order bit of KeyToggleState is 0 or KeyState not touched
+    //
     return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
   }

diff --git 
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestFunction.c
 
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestFunction.c
index adbf3dcf..e20ed345 100644
--- 
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestFunction.c
+++ 
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestFunction.c
@@ -1160,6 +1160,12 @@ BBTestReadKeyStrokeExFunctionAutoTestCheckpoint1 (
   ValidState[5] = EFI_TOGGLE_STATE_VALID | EFI_KEY_STATE_EXPOSED | 
EFI_NUM_LOCK_ACTIVE | EFI_CAPS_LOCK_ACTIVE;
   ValidState[6] = EFI_TOGGLE_STATE_VALID | EFI_KEY_STATE_EXPOSED | 
EFI_SCROLL_LOCK_ACTIVE |EFI_NUM_LOCK_ACTIVE | EFI_CAPS_LOCK_ACTIVE;

+  //
+  // Set all bits to one (invalid values) for both KeyShiftState and 
KeyToggleState
+  //
+  Key.KeyState.KeyShiftState = 0xFFFFFFFF;
+  Key.KeyState.KeyToggleState = 0xFF;
+
   //
   //Read next keystroke from the input device
   //
@@ -1171,7 +1177,10 @@ BBTestReadKeyStrokeExFunctionAutoTestCheckpoint1 (
     return Status;
   }

-  if ((Key.KeyState.KeyToggleState & EFI_TOGGLE_STATE_VALID) == 0) {
+  if (((Key.KeyState.KeyToggleState & EFI_TOGGLE_STATE_VALID) == 0) || 
(Key.KeyState.KeyShiftState == 0xFFFFFFFF) || (Key.KeyState.KeyToggleState == 
0xFF)) {
+    //
+    // Log the error here and return key states are not supported when high 
order bit of KeyToggleState is 0 or KeyState not touched
+    //
     return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
   }

--
2.31.0.windows.1







IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.





IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#88542): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/88542
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/87274606/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to