On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 04:18:56PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote: > Hi Gerd, > > These patches are a great idea but I don't know if we can take GPLv2 code > like that. Are they even mergeable into the main edk2 repo (as it's not > compatible with BSD-2-clause)?
It's build system, doesn't end up being linked into firmware code, so not sure license compatibility is actually a problem here. In any case I strongly prefer to fix that in some automatic way which does *not* require a new GCC12 tool chain definition. So, any comments how to move forward with this? Can we take the series as-is? If not, other suggestions? Second-best idea I've seen on the list is using 'gcc -dumpversion'. Is it an option to just raise the minimum required gcc version to something newer? gcc5 was released almost 7 years ago ... take care, Gerd -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#88517): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/88517 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/90237796/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
