On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 04:55:37PM -0800, Andrew Fish via groups.io wrote: > Very cool idea but ….. > > 1) We don’t always use the systems native compiler and sometimes we use a > cross compiler so making assumptions about system libs is not always valid.
The intrinsics ship with the cross compiler, so that shouldn't be much of a problem. I have a bunch of them here: kraxel@sirius ~# locate libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/11/libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/11/libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/11.2.1/libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/riscv64-linux-gnu/11/libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/riscv64-linux-gnu/11/lib32/ilp32/libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/riscv64-linux-gnu/11/lib32/ilp32d/libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/riscv64-linux-gnu/11/lib64/lp64/libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/riscv64-linux-gnu/11/lib64/lp64d/libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/32/libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/32/libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/11.2.1/libgcc.a > On a Mac with Xcode clang I’ve got full SysV ABI libs (not supper helpful for > EFI), but not EFI/MSFT x86_64 ABI. I don't think the system libs matter at all for uefi builds as they are free-standing. > 2) Are these system libs architecturally defined to be free standing? That seems to be more of a problem, libgcc has calls into libc ... take care, Gerd -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#86147): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/86147 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/87479913/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
