On 9/16/21 3:30 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > >> Good point, there is no reason to read and restore the old GHCB, I will >> remove it in next version. The function does not set this as a GHCB address, >> it send request to hypervisor saying that it would like to use this address. >> If hypervisor is not okay with the address then it may recommend something >> else. We don't support working with the hypervisor preferred address. >> Setting the GHCB address code is common between Snp and Es but checking with >> hypervisor whether its okay to use is new in the GHCBv2 and is SNP specific. > A comment explaining those GHCBv1 vs. GHCBv2 differences would be great.
Sure, I will add comment. thanks -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#80778): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/80778 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/85582697/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
