On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 00:24 +0000, Min Xu wrote:
> On 06/22/2021 9:39 PM, Laszlo wrote:
> > I should clarify: the relevant part of my preference is not that
> > "IntelTdx.dsc"
> > contain the *complete* TDVF feature set. The relevant part (for me)
> > is that
> > "OvmfPkgX64.dsc" *not* be over-complicated for the sake of TDX,
> > even
> > considering only the "basic" TDVF feature set. It's fine to
> > implement TDX in two
> > stages ("basic" and "complete"); my point is that even "basic"
> > should not over-
> > complicate "OvmfPkgX64.dsc".
> >
> Thanks much for the comments and we don't want to make OvmfPkgX64.dsc
> over-complicated either.
> We have updated the design slides to V0.95 and Slides 6-15 are
> discussing the
> Config-A and Config-B.
> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/files/Designs/2021/0611/TDVF_Design_Review%28v0.95%29.pptx
> Your comment is always welcome!
The mailing list still won't give me that file, can you update it in
the bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429
As well, please?
Thanks,
James
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#77020): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/77020
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/83283616/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
