On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 13:25:16 +0100, Michael Brown wrote: > On 09/06/2021 11:57, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > I'm uneducated about the "deliverables" in GSoC, but in general I'd > > suggest narrowing down the scope as much as possible. I don't know how > > hard it is to program USB audio, but if QEMU provides a good device > > model for that, out of the box, I would recommend basing the edk2 work > > on that device. > > QEMU also has good support for passing through a real USB device, which > might be useful if you ever suspect that the QEMU device implementation is > behaving incorrectly.
I have used the USB passthrough in anger, and sometimes it has been flawless, but other times it has been flaky. So, yes - it is worth cross-checking real and emulated hw when running into unexpected issues, but the passed-through hw is not automatically more reliable. / Leif > (This is not implausible: I still have several bugfixes for the QEMU USB > network device emulation sitting in an out-of-tree branch.) > > Michael -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#76272): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/76272 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/83363430/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-