Hi Liming, On 03/19/21 02:04, gaoliming wrote: > Ankur: > Seemly, the patch is missing in this mail.
I can see the patch body just fine in my mailbox / list folder. Also, the list archives seem to have it: - https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/73018 - 20210318184504.2745112-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com">http://mid.mail-archive.com/20210318184504.2745112-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com - https://listman.redhat.com/archives/edk2-devel-archive/2021-March/msg00765.html Ankur, can you post a "RESEND v2" please, anyway? Thanks Laszlo > > Thanks > Liming >> -----邮件原件----- >> 发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> 代表 Ankur Arora >> 发送时间: 2021年3月19日 2:45 >> 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io >> 抄送: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.ar...@oracle.com>; Liming Gao >> <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; Michael D Kinney >> <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> >> 主题: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] MdePkg: use CpuPause() in CpuDeadLoop() >> >> CpuPause() might allow the CPU to go into a lower power state >> state while we spin. >> >> On X86, CpuPause() executes a PAUSE instruction which the Intel >> and AMD specs describe as follows: >> >> Intel: >> "PAUSE: An additional function of the PAUSE instruction is to reduce >> the power consumed by a processor while executing a spin loop. A >> processor can execute a spin-wait loop extremely quickly, causing the >> processor to consume a lot of power while it waits for the resource it >> is spinning on to become available. Inserting a pause instruction in a >> spin-wait loop greatly reduces the processorb > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#73043): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/73043 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81445311/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
