Hi Nate,

I agree this sounds like a good plan. The MinPlatform should be as generic as 
possible and suitable for all architectures.

In fact it is similar to the UEFIPayload package wich is also standalone.

Best Regards,
Wim Vervoorn

Eltan B.V.
Ambachtstraat 23
5481 SM Schijndel
The Netherlands

T : +31-(0)73-594 46 64
E : wvervo...@eltan.com
W : http://www.eltan.com


"This message contains confidential information. Unless you are the intended 
recipient of this message, any use of this message is strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender 
by telephone +31-(0)73-5944664 or reply email, and immediately delete this 
message and all copies."


-----Original Message-----
From: r...@edk2.groups.io [mailto:r...@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of Nate 
DeSimone
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 1:17 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; r...@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Leif Lindholm <l...@nuviainc.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Ard 
Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@arm.com>; Kirkendall, Garrett 
<garrett.kirkend...@amd.com>; Lendacky, Thomas <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>; 
thomas.abra...@arm.com; frank....@dell.com; Jim Dailey <jim.dai...@dell.com>; 
Abner Chang <abner.ch...@hpe.com>; Wang, Sunny (HPS SW) <sunnyw...@hpe.com>; 
Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schae...@hpe.com>; Liming Gao 
<gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; Tim Lewis <tim.le...@insyde.com>; Kevin@Insyde 
<kevin.da...@insyde.com>; Felix Polyudov <fel...@ami.com>; Kinney, Michael D 
<michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.o...@intel.com>; Ni, Ray 
<ray...@intel.com>
Subject: [edk2-rfc] [RFC] Request to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Intel folder

Hi Everyone,

This has come up informally a couple of times already, but I do think that it 
would be beneficial to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Platform/Intel folder and 
into a vendor neutral folder. MinPlatform really isn't Intel specific, it's 
just "middleware" that is intended to make it easier and faster to build EDK II 
based firmware. We have always intended MinPlatform to be vendor neutral, and 
it would be great to see MinPlatform based implementations for non-Intel 
silicon. Anyone working with EDK II should feel welcome to work with us on 
MinPlatform, regardless of the SoC in use.

To that end, I propose that we move MinPlatformPkg out of 
edk2-platforms/Platform/Intel to edk2-platforms/Platform/MinPlatformPkg. It 
might also make sense to move edk2-platforms/Platform/Intel/Tools and 
edk2-platforms/Platform/Intel/build_bios.py to edk2-platforms/Platform as well 
since those are all useful for building MinPlatform based firmware, but I could 
also see that being something for another time. Let me know what you think!

Thanks,
Nate











-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#65779): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/65779
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/77229559/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to