On 2020/9/1 17:12, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> The DxeImageVerificationHandler() function currently checks whether
> "SecDataDir" has enough room for "WinCertificate->dwLength". However, for
> advancing "OffSet", "WinCertificate->dwLength" is aligned to the next
> multiple of 8. If "WinCertificate->dwLength" is large enough, the
> alignment will return 0, and "OffSet" will be stuck at the same value.
> 
> Check whether "SecDataDir" has room left for both
> "WinCertificate->dwLength" and the alignment.
> 
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.w...@intel.com>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen....@intel.com>
> Cc: Min Xu <min.m...@intel.com>
> Cc: Wenyi Xie <xiewen...@huawei.com>
> Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2215
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>

Tested-by: Wenyi Xie <xiewen...@huawei.com>

> ---
>  SecurityPkg/Library/DxeImageVerificationLib/DxeImageVerificationLib.c | 4 
> +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git 
> a/SecurityPkg/Library/DxeImageVerificationLib/DxeImageVerificationLib.c 
> b/SecurityPkg/Library/DxeImageVerificationLib/DxeImageVerificationLib.c
> index 100739eb3eb6..11154b6cc58a 100644
> --- a/SecurityPkg/Library/DxeImageVerificationLib/DxeImageVerificationLib.c
> +++ b/SecurityPkg/Library/DxeImageVerificationLib/DxeImageVerificationLib.c
> @@ -1860,7 +1860,9 @@ DxeImageVerificationHandler (
>        break;
>      }
>      WinCertificate = (WIN_CERTIFICATE *) (mImageBase + OffSet);
> -    if (SecDataDirLeft < WinCertificate->dwLength) {
> +    if (SecDataDirLeft < WinCertificate->dwLength ||
> +        (SecDataDirLeft - WinCertificate->dwLength <
> +         ALIGN_SIZE (WinCertificate->dwLength))) {
>        break;
>      }
>  
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#64931): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/64931
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76552541/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to