On 07/31/20 23:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:

> Regarding actual actions: I'm going to be away for a short while now.
> Plus, I'm not entirely sure what exactly is being prevented by the
> current state of the tree (i.e., how grave the regression is).
> 
> (1) If the current issue interferes with work on, and usability of,
> other packages (that is, anything *not* OvmfPkg), then I would request
> that one of the stewards please revert 656419f922c0 ("Add BhyvePkg, to
> support the bhyve hypervisor", 2020-07-31). For such a revert, please
> add at once:
> 
> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
> 
> This is because the IRL stuff I've got queued up does not allow me to
> participate in the revert, urgently, either from the reviewer side, or
> even from the submitter side. (I wouldn't like to simply push a revert
> without formal review, and I don't have time to *post* the revert
> urgently). I was about to disappear for a bit, and logged back in only
> because I snuck a peek on the mailing list archive, and noticed the
> problem report.
> 
> After the revert, Rebecca and I can collaborate on the next version of
> the patch (I can review that incrementally against the one being
> reverted under this option).
> 
> (2) If, on the other hand, the current issue is restricted to OvmfPkg
> (and even OvmfPkg platforms other than bhyve can be built), then I'd
> like to ask that we keep commit 656419f922c0, and that Rebecca please
> submit an incremental fix (per the above suggestions, assuming they work).
> 
> ... Upon re-reading your comment "causing the other packages to fail", I
> think we have case (1); if that's right, then please proceed accordingly.

I'm proposing a fix here, rather than a revert:

  [edk2-devel] [PATCH]
  OvmfPkg: fix DEC spec violation introduced by Bhyve addition

  https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/63619
  20200801155024.16439-1-lersek@redhat.com">http://mid.mail-archive.com/20200801155024.16439-1-lersek@redhat.com

The posting includes links to a fetchable topic branch and to a personal
CI build.

I'd really prefer merging this patch, instead of a "revert & redo".

Thanks
Laszlo


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#63620): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/63620
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/75472166/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to