Lorena: Thanks for your update. Can you correct name style as Star Zeng <[email protected]> for below message?
Suggested-by: Star Zeng [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Signed-off-by: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Thanks Liming From: De Leon Vasquez, Lorena R <[email protected]> Sent: 2020年7月29日 23:23 To: Gao, Liming <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Lohr, Paul A <[email protected]>; Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix I’ve attached patch with modifications suggested From: Gao, Liming <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:45 AM To: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Lohr, Paul A <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix Lorena: I have one minor comment on this patch. The error return status should be EFI_UNSUPPORTED. + return error; ==> return EFI_UNSUPPORTED; Thanks Liming From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 1:24 AM To: Gao, Liming <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Lohr, Paul A <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix Hi Liming, I’ve attached the patch Thanks, Lorena From: Gao, Liming <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:54 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Lohr, Paul A <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix Paul: This patch is missing to be merged. Lorena: I can’t extract the patch from the mail. Can you send the patch to me? I can help merge it. Thanks Liming From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Lohr, Paul A Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:56 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix Hello, It seems this did not get checked in. Is there something wrong with the patch itself? Or was this simply submitted incorrectly? I don’t see a Bugzilla associated with it is why I ask. Paul A. Lohr - Server Firmware Enabling 512.239.9073 (cell) 512.794.5044 (work) From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 5:46 PM To: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix Reviewed-by: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 7:04 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any Suggested-by: Star Zeng [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Signed-off-by: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> -- .../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c | 11 ++++------- .../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c | 11 ++++------- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c index cc970c0..61fbb4a 100644 --- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c +++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c @@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry ( DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function)); - switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) { - case BIT1: - ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1; - break; - case BIT2: - ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2; - break; + if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) { + DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex)); + return error; } + ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2; } FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages)); diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c index 0da1611..6bd31b7 100644 --- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c +++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c @@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry ( DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function)); - switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) { - case BIT1: - ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1; - break; - case BIT2: - ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2; - break; + if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) { + DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex)); + return error; } + ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2; } FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages)); -- 2.21.0.windows.1 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#63551): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/63551 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71688474/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
