On 5/22/20 5:05 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 05/21/20 19:25, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 05/19/20 23:50, Lendacky, Thomas wrote:
BZ: 
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.tianocore.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D2198&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7C6eeb665fe5884b34f2b408d7fe37afcb%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637257387447015060&sdata=zteeG%2B8CL03l1w6SrqcadCH7tSTe8F5FmLhBRxLFy4k%3D&reserved=0

Under SEV-ES, a IOIO_PROT intercept generates a #VC exception. VMGEXIT
must be used to allow the hypervisor to handle this intercept.

Add support to construct the required GHCB values to support a IOIO_PROT
NAE event.  Parse the instruction that generated the #VC exception,
setting the required register values in the GHCB and creating the proper
SW_EXITINFO1 value in the GHCB.

Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>
---
  .../Library/VmgExitLib/X64/VmgExitVcHandler.c | 604 +++++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 590 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/X64/VmgExitVcHandler.c 
b/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/X64/VmgExitVcHandler.c
index 036f030d6b34..b4578ae922c1 100644
--- a/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/X64/VmgExitVcHandler.c
+++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/X64/VmgExitVcHandler.c
@@ -12,6 +12,573 @@
  #include <Library/VmgExitLib.h>
  #include <Register/Amd/Msr.h>
+//
+// Instruction execution mode definition
+//
+typedef enum {
+  LongMode64Bit        = 0,
+  LongModeCompat32Bit,
+  LongModeCompat16Bit,
+} SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_MODE;
+
+//
+// Instruction size definition (for operand and address)
+//
+typedef enum {
+  Size8Bits            = 0,
+  Size16Bits,
+  Size32Bits,
+  Size64Bits,
+} SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_SIZE;
+
+//
+// Intruction segment definition
+//
+typedef enum {
+  SegmentEs            = 0,
+  SegmentCs,
+  SegmentSs,
+  SegmentDs,
+  SegmentFs,
+  SegmentGs,
+} SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_SEGMENT;
+
+//
+// Instruction rep function definition
+//
+typedef enum {
+  RepNone              = 0,
+  RepZ,
+  RepNZ,
+} SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_REP;
+
+//
+// Instruction REX prefix definition
+//
+typedef union {
+  struct {
+    UINT8  BitB:1;
+    UINT8  BitX:1;
+    UINT8  BitR:1;
+    UINT8  BitW:1;
+    UINT8  Rex:4;
+  } Bits;
+
+  UINT8  Uint8;
+} SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_REX_PREFIX;
+
+//
+// Instruction ModRM definition
+//
+typedef union {
+  struct {
+    UINT8  Rm:3;
+    UINT8  Reg:3;
+    UINT8  Mod:2;
+  } Bits;
+
+  UINT8  Uint8;
+} SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_MODRM;
+
+typedef struct {
+  UINT8  Rm;
+  UINT8  Reg;
+  UINT8  Mod;
+} SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_MODRM_EXT;
+
+//
+// Instruction SIB definition
+//
+typedef union {
+  struct {
+    UINT8  Base:3;
+    UINT8  Index:3;
+    UINT8  Scale:2;
+  } Bits;
+
+  UINT8  Uint8;
+} SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_SIB;
+
+typedef struct {
+  UINT8  Base;
+  UINT8  Index;
+  UINT8  Scale;
+} SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_SIB_EXT;
+
+//
+// Instruction opcode definition
+//
+typedef struct {
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_MODRM_EXT  ModRm;
+
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_SIB_EXT    Sib;
+
+  UINTN                         RegData;
+  UINTN                         RmData;
+} SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_OPCODE_EXT;
+
+//
+// Instruction parsing context definition
+//
+typedef struct {
+  GHCB                           *Ghcb;
+
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_MODE        Mode;
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_SIZE        DataSize;
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_SIZE        AddrSize;
+  BOOLEAN                        SegmentSpecified;
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_SEGMENT     Segment;
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_REP         RepMode;
+
+  UINT8                          *Begin;
+  UINT8                          *End;
+
+  UINT8                          *Prefixes;
+  UINT8                          *OpCodes;
+  UINT8                          *Displacement;
+  UINT8                          *Immediate;
+
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_REX_PREFIX  RexPrefix;
+
+  BOOLEAN                        ModRmPresent;
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_MODRM       ModRm;
+
+  BOOLEAN                        SibPresent;
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_SIB         Sib;
+
+  UINTN                          PrefixSize;
+  UINTN                          OpCodeSize;
+  UINTN                          DisplacementSize;
+  UINTN                          ImmediateSize;
+
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_OPCODE_EXT  Ext;
+} SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_DATA;
+
+//
+// Non-automatic Exit function prototype
+//
+typedef
+UINT64
+(*NAE_EXIT) (
+  GHCB                     *Ghcb,
+  EFI_SYSTEM_CONTEXT_X64   *Regs,
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_DATA  *InstructionData
+  );
+

(1) From the typedefs above, can we move those that are defined in
industry specs (such as AMD SEV specs) to header file(s)? For example,
under OvmfPkg/Include/Register or OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard.

+
+/**
+  Checks the GHCB to determine if the specified register has been marked valid.
+
+  The ValidBitmap area represents the areas of the GHCB that have been marked
+  valid. Return an indication of whether the area of the GHCB that holds the
+  specified register has been marked valid.
+
+  @param[in] Ghcb    Pointer to the Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block
+  @param[in] Reg     Offset in the GHCB of the register to check
+
+  @retval TRUE       Register has been marked vald in the GHCB
+  @retval FALSE      Register has not been marked valid in the GHCB
+
+**/
+STATIC
+BOOLEAN
+GhcbIsRegValid (
+  IN GHCB                *Ghcb,
+  IN GHCB_REGISTER       Reg
+  )
+{
+  UINT32  RegIndex;
+  UINT32  RegBit;
+
+  RegIndex = Reg / 8;
+  RegBit   = Reg & 0x07;
+
+  return (Ghcb->SaveArea.ValidBitmap[RegIndex] & (1 << RegBit));

(10) Please check the patches for uses of the bitwise AND operator,
where the result is considered as a logical value.

In those contexts, the edk2 coding style needs an explicit comparison
against 0. For example, the above would be:

   return (Ghcb->SaveArea.ValidBitmap[RegIndex] & (1 << RegBit)) != 0;


This is actually more than just a style question, generally speaking.
BOOLEAN in edk2 is a typedef to UINT8 (well, more precisely, to
"unsigned char"). It is not like the _Bool type in ISO C99.

ISO C99 says about _Bool, in section "6.3.1.2 Boolean type": "When any
scalar value is converted to _Bool, the result is 0 if the value
compares equal to 0; otherwise, the result is 1." (Footnote: "NaNs do
not compare equal to 0 and thus convert to 1.")

However, BOOLEAN is "unsigned char" and not _Bool; therefore, if you do
for example:

BOOLEAN
IsBit8Set (
   IN UINT16 Value
   )
{
   return Value & BIT8;
}

then IsBit8Set (0x100) will return FALSE -- converting 0x100 to
"unsigned char" yields 0.

In edk2, in every context (not just in return statements) where we have
(Expr1 & Expr2) consumed as a logical result, we're supposed to write
((Expr1 & Expr2) != 0). (The inner parens are important as bit-AND has
weaker binding than "==" and "!=".)

Please check the rest of the patches for this.

Yes, I'll audit all the patches for this.

Thanks!
Tom


Thanks!
Laszlo

+}
+
+/**
+  Marks a register as valid in the GHCB.
+
+  The ValidBitmap area represents the areas of the GHCB that have been marked
+  valid. Set the area of the GHCB that holds the specified register as valid.
+
+  @param[in, out] Ghcb    Pointer to the Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block
+  @param[in] Reg          Offset in the GHCB of the register to mark valid
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+GhcbSetRegValid (
+  IN OUT GHCB                *Ghcb,
+  IN     GHCB_REGISTER       Reg
+  )
+{
+  UINT32  RegIndex;
+  UINT32  RegBit;
+
+  RegIndex = Reg / 8;
+  RegBit   = Reg & 0x07;
+
+  Ghcb->SaveArea.ValidBitmap[RegIndex] |= (1 << RegBit);
+}
+
+/**
+  Decode instruction prefixes.
+
+  Parse the instruction data to track the instruction prefixes that have
+  been used.
+
+  @param[in]      Regs             x64 processor context
+  @param[in, out] InstructionData  Instruction parsing context
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+DecodePrefixes (
+  IN     EFI_SYSTEM_CONTEXT_X64   *Regs,
+  IN OUT SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_DATA  *InstructionData
+  )
+{
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_MODE  Mode;
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_SIZE  ModeDataSize;
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_SIZE  ModeAddrSize;
+  UINT8                    *Byte;
+
+  /*TODO: Determine current mode - 64-bit for now */

(2) I'm OK with a TODO comment, but please use the idiomatic style.

+  Mode = LongMode64Bit;
+  ModeDataSize = Size32Bits;
+  ModeAddrSize = Size64Bits;
+
+  InstructionData->Mode = Mode;
+  InstructionData->DataSize = ModeDataSize;
+  InstructionData->AddrSize = ModeAddrSize;
+
+  InstructionData->Prefixes = InstructionData->Begin;
+
+  Byte = InstructionData->Prefixes;
+  for ( ; ; Byte++, InstructionData->PrefixSize++) {
+    //
+    // Check the 0x40 to 0x4F range using an if statement here since some
+    // compilers don't like the "case 0x40 ... 0x4F:" syntax. This avoids
+    // 16 case statements below.
+    //
+    if ((*Byte >= 0x40) && (*Byte <= 0x4F)) {
+      InstructionData->RexPrefix.Uint8 = *Byte;
+      if (*Byte & 0x08)
+        InstructionData->DataSize = Size64Bits;
+      continue;
+    }
+
+    switch (*Byte) {
+    case 0x26:
+    case 0x2E:
+    case 0x36:
+    case 0x3E:
+      if (Mode != LongMode64Bit) {
+        InstructionData->SegmentSpecified = TRUE;
+        InstructionData->Segment = (*Byte >> 3) & 3;
+      }
+      break;
+
+    case 0x64:
+      InstructionData->SegmentSpecified = TRUE;
+      InstructionData->Segment = *Byte & 7;
+      break;
+
+    case 0x66:
+      if (!InstructionData->RexPrefix.Uint8) {
+        InstructionData->DataSize =
+          (Mode == LongMode64Bit)       ? Size16Bits :
+          (Mode == LongModeCompat32Bit) ? Size16Bits :
+          (Mode == LongModeCompat16Bit) ? Size32Bits : 0;
+      }
+      break;
+
+    case 0x67:
+      InstructionData->AddrSize =
+        (Mode == LongMode64Bit)       ? Size32Bits :
+        (Mode == LongModeCompat32Bit) ? Size16Bits :
+        (Mode == LongModeCompat16Bit) ? Size32Bits : 0;
+      break;
+
+    case 0xF0:
+      break;
+
+    case 0xF2:
+      InstructionData->RepMode = RepZ;
+      break;
+
+    case 0xF3:
+      InstructionData->RepMode = RepNZ;
+      break;
+
+    default:
+      InstructionData->OpCodes = Byte;
+      InstructionData->OpCodeSize = (*Byte == 0x0F) ? 2 : 1;
+
+      InstructionData->End = Byte + InstructionData->OpCodeSize;
+      InstructionData->Displacement = InstructionData->End;
+      InstructionData->Immediate = InstructionData->End;
+      return;
+    }
+  }
+}

(3) Can we introduce macros or enum constants for the prefixes?

Although, I seem to remember that QEMU's TCG and even KVM's instruction
parser uses open-coded magic constants for the prefixes, so the above
code would not be without precedent.

Can we please add comments (stating the prefix names) near the case
labels at least?

+
+/**
+  Determine instruction length
+
+  Return the total length of the parsed instruction.
+
+  @param[in] InstructionData  Instruction parsing context
+
+  @retval                     Length of parsed instruction

(4) @retval is for specific return values (enum constants, macros etc).
For general descriptions, please use @return, not @retval.

Please review the rest of the patches from this angle.

+
+**/
+STATIC
+UINT64
+InstructionLength (
+  IN SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_DATA  *InstructionData
+  )
+{
+  return (UINT64) (InstructionData->End - InstructionData->Begin);
+}
+
+/**
+  Initialize the instruction parsing context.
+
+  Initialize the instruction parsing context, which includes decoding the
+  instruction prefixes.
+
+  @param[in, out] InstructionData  Instruction parsing context
+  @param[in]      Ghcb             Pointer to the Guest-Hypervisor 
Communication
+                                   Block
+  @param[in]      Regs             x64 processor context
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+InitInstructionData (
+  IN OUT SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_DATA  *InstructionData,
+  IN     GHCB                     *Ghcb,
+  IN     EFI_SYSTEM_CONTEXT_X64   *Regs
+  )
+{
+  SetMem (InstructionData, sizeof (*InstructionData), 0);
+  InstructionData->Ghcb = Ghcb;
+  InstructionData->Begin = (UINT8 *) Regs->Rip;
+  InstructionData->End = (UINT8 *) Regs->Rip;
+
+  DecodePrefixes (Regs, InstructionData);
+}
+
+/**
+  Report an unsupported event to the hypervisor
+
+  Use the VMGEXIT support to report an unsupported event to the hypervisor.
+
+  @param[in] Ghcb             Pointer to the Guest-Hypervisor Communication
+                              Block
+  @param[in] Regs             x64 processor context
+  @param[in] InstructionData  Instruction parsing context
+
+  @retval                     New exception value to propagate
+
+**/
+STATIC
+UINT64
+UnsupportedExit (
+  IN GHCB                     *Ghcb,
+  IN EFI_SYSTEM_CONTEXT_X64   *Regs,
+  IN SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_DATA  *InstructionData
+  )
+{
+  UINT64  Status;
+
+  Status = VmgExit (Ghcb, SVM_EXIT_UNSUPPORTED, Regs->ExceptionData, 0);
+  if (Status == 0) {
+    GHCB_EVENT_INJECTION  Event;
+
+    Event.Uint64 = 0;
+    Event.Elements.Vector = GP_EXCEPTION;
+    Event.Elements.Type   = GHCB_EVENT_INJECTION_TYPE_EXCEPTION;
+    Event.Elements.Valid  = 1;
+
+    Status = Event.Uint64;
+  }
+
+  return Status;
+}
+
+#define IOIO_TYPE_STR       (1 << 2)
+#define IOIO_TYPE_IN        1
+#define IOIO_TYPE_INS       (IOIO_TYPE_IN | IOIO_TYPE_STR)
+#define IOIO_TYPE_OUT       0
+#define IOIO_TYPE_OUTS      (IOIO_TYPE_OUT | IOIO_TYPE_STR)
+
+#define IOIO_REP            (1 << 3)
+
+#define IOIO_ADDR_64        (1 << 9)
+#define IOIO_ADDR_32        (1 << 8)
+#define IOIO_ADDR_16        (1 << 7)
+
+#define IOIO_DATA_32        (1 << 6)
+#define IOIO_DATA_16        (1 << 5)
+#define IOIO_DATA_8         (1 << 4)
+#define IOIO_DATA_BYTES(x)  (((x) & 0x70) >> 4)
+
+#define IOIO_SEG_ES         (0 << 10)
+#define IOIO_SEG_DS         (3 << 10)

(5) I feel like these macros belong in:

   MdePkg/Include/Register/Amd/Ghcb.h

Do you agree?

If that exact header file is not the best, then I'd request a new header
file under OvmfPkg/Include/Register.

(6) I'd also suggest using BIT2, BIT3, BIT9, rather than the open-coded
shifts. BITx reads more natural in edk2 source.


+
+/**
+  Build the IOIO event information.
+
+  The IOIO event information identifies the type of IO operation to be 
performed
+  by the hypervisor. Build this information based on the instruction data.
+
+  @param[in]       Regs             x64 processor context
+  @param[in, out]  InstructionData  Instruction parsing context
+
+  @retval Others                    IOIO event information value

(7) Even though "@retval Others" is a common pattern in edk2, I consider
it a mis-use of "@retval". Whenever we're tempted to write "@retval
Others", we should just use "@return". Here, for example:

   @return  IOIO event information values.

If you strongly disagree, I won't insist; I'm not trying to create
busywork for you. Otherwise, please check the rest of the OvmfPkg
patches for "@retval Others".

+
+**/
+STATIC
+UINT64
+IoioExitInfo (
+  IN     EFI_SYSTEM_CONTEXT_X64   *Regs,
+  IN OUT SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_DATA  *InstructionData
+  )
+{
+  UINT64  ExitInfo;
+
+  ExitInfo = 0;
+
+  switch (*(InstructionData->OpCodes)) {
+  // IN immediate opcodes

(8) Right, I love these comments; please do use one of the idiomatic
comment styles though. Either prepend and append empty "//" lines, or
move the single-line "//" to the right of the case labels.

+  case 0xE4:
+  case 0xE5:
+    InstructionData->ImmediateSize = 1;
+    InstructionData->End++;
+    ExitInfo |= IOIO_TYPE_IN;
+    ExitInfo |= ((*(InstructionData->OpCodes + 1)) << 16);
+    break;
+
+  // OUT immediate opcodes
+  case 0xE6:
+  case 0xE7:
+    InstructionData->ImmediateSize = 1;
+    InstructionData->End++;
+    ExitInfo |= IOIO_TYPE_OUT;
+    ExitInfo |= ((*(InstructionData->OpCodes + 1)) << 16) | IOIO_TYPE_OUT;
+    break;
+
+  // IN register opcodes
+  case 0xEC:
+  case 0xED:
+    ExitInfo |= IOIO_TYPE_IN;
+    ExitInfo |= ((Regs->Rdx & 0xffff) << 16);
+    break;
+
+  // OUT register opcodes
+  case 0xEE:
+  case 0xEF:
+    ExitInfo |= IOIO_TYPE_OUT;
+    ExitInfo |= ((Regs->Rdx & 0xffff) << 16);
+    break;
+
+  default:
+    return 0;
+  }
+
+  switch (*(InstructionData->OpCodes)) {
+  case 0xE4:
+  case 0xE6:
+  case 0xEC:
+  case 0xEE:
+    // Single-byte opcodes

(9) Please make both the location and the style of this comment
consistent with (8).

All my comments are superficial, and that's fine. I totally intend to
let you do what you need to do in this library (I can tell that writing
a new instruction decoder must have been hellish work), so I don't want
to get in your way -- just please make this easier to browse with "edk2
eyes".

I'm ready to ACK the patch once all comments have been addressed -- I'm
not giving an A-b at once because some of my requests / proposals need
concrete values filled in (such as header file names).

Thanks!
Laszlo

+    ExitInfo |= IOIO_DATA_8;
+    break;
+
+  default:
+    // Length determined by instruction parsing
+    ExitInfo |= (InstructionData->DataSize == Size16Bits) ? IOIO_DATA_16
+                                                          : IOIO_DATA_32;
+  }
+
+  switch (InstructionData->AddrSize) {
+  case Size16Bits:
+    ExitInfo |= IOIO_ADDR_16;
+    break;
+
+  case Size32Bits:
+    ExitInfo |= IOIO_ADDR_32;
+    break;
+
+  case Size64Bits:
+    ExitInfo |= IOIO_ADDR_64;
+    break;
+
+  default:
+    break;
+  }
+
+  if (InstructionData->RepMode) {
+    ExitInfo |= IOIO_REP;
+  }
+
+  return ExitInfo;
+}
+
+/**
+  Handle an IOIO event.
+
+  Use the VMGEXIT instruction to handle an IOIO event.
+
+  @param[in, out] Ghcb             Pointer to the Guest-Hypervisor 
Communication
+                                   Block
+  @param[in, out] Regs             x64 processor context
+  @param[in]      InstructionData  Instruction parsing context
+
+  @retval 0                        Event handled successfully
+  @retval Others                   New exception value to propagate
+
+**/
+STATIC
+UINT64
+IoioExit (
+  IN OUT GHCB                     *Ghcb,
+  IN OUT EFI_SYSTEM_CONTEXT_X64   *Regs,
+  IN     SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_DATA  *InstructionData
+  )
+{
+  UINT64  ExitInfo1, Status;
+
+  ExitInfo1 = IoioExitInfo (Regs, InstructionData);
+  if (!ExitInfo1) {
+    return UnsupportedExit (Ghcb, Regs, InstructionData);
+  }
+
+  if (ExitInfo1 & IOIO_TYPE_IN) {
+    Ghcb->SaveArea.Rax = 0;
+  } else {
+    CopyMem (&Ghcb->SaveArea.Rax, &Regs->Rax, IOIO_DATA_BYTES (ExitInfo1));
+  }
+  GhcbSetRegValid (Ghcb, GhcbRax);
+
+  Status = VmgExit (Ghcb, SVM_EXIT_IOIO_PROT, ExitInfo1, 0);
+  if (Status) {
+    return Status;
+  }
+
+  if (ExitInfo1 & IOIO_TYPE_IN) {
+    if (!GhcbIsRegValid (Ghcb, GhcbRax)) {
+      return UnsupportedExit (Ghcb, Regs, InstructionData);
+    }
+    CopyMem (&Regs->Rax, &Ghcb->SaveArea.Rax, IOIO_DATA_BYTES (ExitInfo1));
+  }
+
+  return 0;
+}
+
  /**
    Handle a #VC exception.
@@ -38,6 +605,8 @@ VmgExitHandleVc (
    MSR_SEV_ES_GHCB_REGISTER  Msr;
    EFI_SYSTEM_CONTEXT_X64    *Regs;
    GHCB                      *Ghcb;
+  NAE_EXIT                  NaeExit;
+  SEV_ES_INSTRUCTION_DATA   InstructionData;
    UINT64                    ExitCode, Status;
    EFI_STATUS                VcRet;
@@ -54,24 +623,31 @@ VmgExitHandleVc ( ExitCode = Regs->ExceptionData;
    switch (ExitCode) {
+  case SVM_EXIT_IOIO_PROT:
+    NaeExit = IoioExit;
+    break;
+
    default:
-    Status = VmgExit (Ghcb, SVM_EXIT_UNSUPPORTED, ExitCode, 0);
-    if (Status == 0) {
-      Regs->ExceptionData = 0;
-      *ExceptionType = GP_EXCEPTION;
+    NaeExit = UnsupportedExit;
+  }
+
+  InitInstructionData (&InstructionData, Ghcb, Regs);
+
+  Status = NaeExit (Ghcb, Regs, &InstructionData);
+  if (Status == 0) {
+    Regs->Rip += InstructionLength (&InstructionData);
+  } else {
+    GHCB_EVENT_INJECTION  Event;
+
+    Event.Uint64 = Status;
+    if (Event.Elements.ErrorCodeValid) {
+      Regs->ExceptionData = Event.Elements.ErrorCode;
      } else {
-      GHCB_EVENT_INJECTION  Event;
-
-      Event.Uint64 = Status;
-      if (Event.Elements.ErrorCodeValid) {
-        Regs->ExceptionData = Event.Elements.ErrorCode;
-      } else {
-        Regs->ExceptionData = 0;
-      }
-
-      *ExceptionType = Event.Elements.Vector;
+      Regs->ExceptionData = 0;
      }
+ *ExceptionType = Event.Elements.Vector;
+
      VcRet = EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
    }






-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#60143): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/60143
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/74336567/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to