On 05/14/20 18:20, Rebecca Cran wrote: > >> On May 14, 2020, at 4:24 AM, Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> - The community not having any human resources permanently dedicated to >> bhyve regressions (testing, review, and post factum fixing) is fine, as >> long as the bhyve stakeholders can live with a matching frequency of >> regressions. > > Yes, I believe that would be acceptable. > Has there been a decision on the directory structure yet, or is that likely > to be something that will need resolved at the next Stewards Meeting?
Based on the discussion thus far, I'd suggest "OvmfPkg/SecondClass/Bhyve". If you have the time, just go ahead and submit the series like that, and wait for review. If you'd first like to be sure that everyone's OK with this pathname, then please wait for more feedback in this thread. Thanks Laszlo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#59671): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/59671 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/74075377/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
