On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 14:16, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 14:13, Leif Lindholm <l...@nuviainc.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:03:53 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > Cache maintenance on ARMv7 systems and up should be done by virtual
> > > address if the purpose is to manage the cached state of contents of
> > > memory. Set/way operations are only intended to maintain the caches
> > > themselves, e.g., to ensure that the contents of dirty cachelines
> > > are brought to main memory before the core is powered off entirely.
> > >
> > > UEFI on ARM is typically not involved in the latter at all, and any
> > > cache maintenance it does is to ensure that the memory it occupies
> > > and modifies remains in a consistent state with respect to the
> > > caches.
> > >
> > > So let's deprecate the set/way routines now that we have removed all
> > > uses of it in the core code.
> >
> > Does this patch simply get dropped in favour of the ASSERT variant?
> >
>
> Yes.
>
> But I realised that we still need a fix for CmdRunAxf in that case :-(

As discussed on IRC, with CmdRunAxf out of the way, we can ASSERT ()
on any use of the set/way ops with the MMU/dcache enabled. In any
case, this 6/6 will simply be dropped, and superseded by my followup
series '[PATCH 0/3] ArmPkg/ArmLib: ASSERT() on misuse of set/way ops'

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#55405): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/55405
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71562852/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to