On 02/13/20 14:12, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> > > A following patch is going to use the same configuration for TPM1.2 > and TPM2.0, and it's simpler to support both than variable > configurations. > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> > --- > OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.fdf | 8 ++++---- > OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.fdf | 8 ++++---- > OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.fdf | 8 ++++---- > 6 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
Hm..., OK. I can live with this. I'd prefer keeping them separate, but you have a valid point that, *if* someone decides to enable at least one TPM version, they might as well enable both. So, Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> Thanks! Laszlo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#54469): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/54469 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71240873/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
