Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.d...@intel.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Wu, Hao A
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 8:35 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a...@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Ni, Ray 
<ray...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Fu, Siyuan 
<siyuan...@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Always get CPUID & 
PlatformID in MicrocodeDetect()

REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2498

Commit fd30b00707 updated the logic in function MicrocodeDetect() that will 
directly use the CPUID and PlatformID information from the 'CpuData'
field in the CPU_MP_DATA structure, instead of collecting these information for 
each processor via AsmCpuid() and AsmReadMsr64() calls respectively.

At that moment, this approach worked fine for APs. Since:
a) When the APs are waken up for the 1st time (1st MpInitLibInitialize()
   entry at PEI phase), the function InitializeApData() will be called for
   each AP and the CPUID and PlatformID information will be collected.

b) During the 2nd entry of MpInitLibInitialize() at DXE phase, when the
   APs are waken up again, the function InitializeApData() will not be
   called, which means the CPUID and PlatformID information will not be
   collected. However, the below logics in MicrocodeDetect() function:

  CurrentRevision = GetCurrentMicrocodeSignature ();
  IsBspCallIn     = (ProcessorNumber == (UINTN)CpuMpData->BspNumber) ? TRUE : 
FALSE;
  if (CurrentRevision != 0 && !IsBspCallIn) {
    //
    // Skip loading microcode if it has been loaded successfully
    //
    return;
  }

   will ensure that the microcode detection and application will be
   skipped due to the fact that such process has already been done in the
   PEI phase.

But after commit 396e791059, which removes the above skip loading logic, the 
CPUID and PlatformID information on APs will be used upon the 2nd entry of the 
MpInitLibInitialize(). But since the CPUID and PlatformID information has not 
been collected, it will bring issue to the microcode detection process.

This commit will update the logic in MicrocodeDetect() back to always 
collecting the CPUID and PlatformID information explicitly.

Cc: Eric Dong <eric.d...@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray...@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan...@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a...@intel.com>
---
 UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c 
b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
index b6675b9a60..67e214d463 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ MicrocodeDetect (
   UINT32                                  InCompleteCheckSum32;
   BOOLEAN                                 CorrectMicrocode;
   VOID                                    *MicrocodeData;
+  MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID_REGISTER           PlatformIdMsr;
   UINT32                                  ThreadId;
   BOOLEAN                                 IsBspCallIn;
 
@@ -115,8 +116,18 @@ MicrocodeDetect (
   }
 
   ExtendedTableLength = 0;
-  Eax.Uint32 = CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber].ProcessorSignature;
-  PlatformId = CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber].PlatformId;
+  //
+  // Here data of CPUID leafs have not been collected into context 
+ buffer, so  // GetProcessorCpuid() cannot be used here to retrieve CPUID data.
+  //
+  AsmCpuid (CPUID_VERSION_INFO, &Eax.Uint32, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
+  //
+  // The index of platform information resides in bits 50:52 of MSR 
+ IA32_PLATFORM_ID  //
+  PlatformIdMsr.Uint64 = AsmReadMsr64 (MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID);
+ PlatformId = (UINT8) PlatformIdMsr.Bits.PlatformId;
+
 
   //
   // Check whether AP has same processor with BSP.
--
2.12.0.windows.1





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#53723): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53723
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/70934372/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to