On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 01:34:55AM +0000, Gao, Liming wrote:
> Anthony:
>   This change is OK to me. But if this PCD is configured as Dynamic, its 
> value will be got from PCD service. This operation will take some time and 
> cause the inaccurate time delay. Have you measured its impact?

No, I haven't. But I don't think it matter in a Xen guest, the APIC timer is
emulated anyway, so reading from a register of the APIC is going to be
slower than getting the value from the PCD services, I think.
(Hopefully, I'm not too wrong.)

But I'll give it at measuring the difference, it would be interesting to
know.

Thanks,

-- 
Anthony PERARD

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#53672): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53672
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/70239981/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to