On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 12:55:10PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:16 AM Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org> 
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:07:52AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > > +Leif, comment at bottom
> >
> > Thanks Laszlo. +Dann, -kexec.
> >
> > > On 10/30/19 09:16, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
> > > >> So if you want to add these properties, you should add them there.
> > > >>
> > > >> Can you explain why doing this is necessary?
> > > >
> > > > I am trying to test kexec -p (kdump feature) on CentOS-release
> > > > 7.7.1908 and Ubuntu-18.04 distributions.
> > > >
> > > >  "kexec -p" command show error on Ubuntu. While no error on CentOS
> > > >
> > > > CentOS:
> > > > $ kexec -p /boot/vmlinuz-`uname -r` --initrd=/boot/initramfs-`uname
> > > > -r`.img --reuse-cmdline
> > > > $    ==> No error
> > > >
> > > > Ubuntu
> > > > $ kexec -p /boot/vmlinuz-`uname -r` --initrd=/boot/initrd.img-`uname
> > > > -r` --reuse-cmdline
> > > > $ kexec: elfcorehdr doesn't fit cells-size.
> > > > $ kexec: setup_2nd_dtb failed.
> > > > $ kexec: load failed.
> > > > $ Cannot load /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-rc4+
> > > >
> > > > Note: Both CentOS and Ubuntu has Linux-5.4-rc4 tag.
> > > >
> > > > When i debugged further reason for Ubuntu error is due to
> > > > address-cells and size-cells as "1"
> > > > log from kexec tool :-
> > > > load_crashdump_segments: elfcorehdr 0x7f7cbfc000-0x7f7cbff7ff
> > > > read_1st_dtb: found name =dtb_sys  /sys/firmware/fdt
> > > > get_cells_size: #address-cells:1 #size-cells:1
> > > >
> > > > On CentOS both values are "2".
> > > > log from kexec tool :-
> > > > load_crashdump_segments: elfcorehdr 0xbf98bf0000-0xbf98bf33ff
> > > > read_1st_dtb: found nmae=dtb_sys /sys/firmware/fdt
> > > > get_cells_size: #address-cells:2 #size-cells:2
> > > >
> > > > Note: Kexec tool read values from /sys/firmware/fdt.
> > > >
> > > > I am trying to figure out why 2 distributions showing different values.
> > >
> > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=347210a5d5ce655b95315f320faa515afb723c11
> > >
> > > Ubuntu probably ships a grub version that lacks this commit.
> >
> > Yes, it came after the 18.04 release.
> > Dann: given that 18.04 is LTS, would it be reasonable to cherry-pick
> > this grub patch? I would consider the behaviour without it to be a
> > bug.
> 
> Leif,
> 
>   Likely - I'll run some tests and get back to you...

Can you help me understand the scenario in which the above patch is
required? I tested an 18.04 VM w/ AAVMF (ACPI-mode), and kexec -p
worked fine. I also verified that 18.04 does not carry the above patch.

  -dann

> 
> > /
> >     Leif
> >
> > > (The commit was first released as part of upstream grub-2.04. I have no
> > > idea what version of grub is shipped in the CentOS distro you mention
> > > above -- it could be based upon upstream 2.04, or the upstream patch may
> > > have been backported to CentOS.)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Laszlo
> > >
> 
> 
> 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#49780): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/49780
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/39480086/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to