> -----Original Message----- > From: David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org> > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 10:36 PM > To: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Gao, Junhao <junhao....@intel.com>; > devel@edk2.groups.io > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] question about qemu+kvm+ovmf+winxp > > On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 16:27 +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > On 10/11/19 09:44, Gao, Junhao wrote: > > > Hi David > > > > > > I have found this compiled OVMF-with-csm.fd can support winxp > > > booting > up. > > > OVMF-with-csm.fd path: > https://www.kraxel.org/repos/jenkins/seabios/seabios.git-csm-1.12.0- > 33.63.g43f5df7.x86_64.rpm > > > Then could you help to provide me the compile method and base code > > > to > reproduce this OVMF-with-csm.fd? > > > > Ah, good point, I should have remembered that Gerd offers a CSM build in > > his repo! > > > > So, you can easily look up the build instructions, in Gerd's SeaBIOS and > > OVMF RPM "spec" files. Check out these git repositories: > > > > https://git.kraxel.org/cgit/jenkins/seabios/ > > https://git.kraxel.org/cgit/jenkins/edk2/ > > > > Specifically: > > > > https://git.kraxel.org/cgit/jenkins/seabios/tree/seabios.git.spec > > https://git.kraxel.org/cgit/jenkins/edk2/tree/edk2.git.spec.template > > Right, thanks. > > Ultimately it's as simple as: > > • Build SeaBIOS with CONFIG_CSM > • Drop the resulting Csm16.bin into OvmfPkg/Csm/Csm16/ in the EDK2 tree > • Build EDK2 with -DCSM_ENABLE >
Thanks David, follow these steps, I can reproduce the OVMF-with-csm.fd. However, I find that when I choose remotes/origin/master branch, after compiling, qemu+kvm+ovmf+winxp can't boot up, but when I choose remotes/origin/UDK2018, the compiled OVMF.fd can work. So the latest edk2 code have removed CSM support? Could I apply the CSM patch to the latest edk2 code to support my work because our project is based on the latest EDK2 code, thanks. > Someone else mailed me recently to say they'd copied the Csm packages > over from OvmfPkg to Quark and had Windows booting on Galileo boards. > > Hm, I wonder if we should move the CSM support out of OVMF and into > somewhere more generic, since it really is generic and not platform- > specific? I can't make some decisions, from my view, maybe CSM module can be an independent patch for user to apply or reject :) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#48858): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/48858 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/34476019/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
