On 2019-09-03 10:41, Ni, Ray wrote: > Can we change the process a bit? > 1. maintainers created pull requests on behave of the patch owners > 2. patch owners can be notified automatically if pull requests fail > 3. patch owners update the pull requests > (I am not familiar to pull requests. I assume the rights of modifying > pull requests and creating pull requests are separated. Are they?) > > So, maintainers only need to initiate the pull requests. It assumes when pull > requests are initiated, everyone at least agrees the justifications of the > changes are valid and the ways the changes are done.
In other projects I've worked on, patch owners initiate the pre-commit build/test, and either comment on the review (ideally with link to the results) about its status, or have the CI system comment automatically on the review page/thread. Once the maintainer has signed off on the patch, it can then be sent for gatekeeping, which is either a manual process whereby the repo owner (or subsystem maintainer) checks the review, runs any additional tests they want etc. - or via a 'land' command (for example with Review Board it's "rbt land") which automates the checks and pushes the changeset. I understand that with Azure Pipelines and how it integrates with Github, along with the fact that this project doesn't use pull requests or any other review automation, means things are probably going to be pretty different to most other projects for now. -- Rebecca Cran -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#46836): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/46836 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/33122986/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-