Hi Leif, Laszlo śr., 21 sie 2019 o 11:11 Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> napisał(a): > > On 08/19/19 19:14, Leif Lindholm wrote: > > +Stewards (don't panic!) > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:03:42PM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > >> Hi Leif, > >> > >> pt., 16 sie 2019 o 19:10 Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org> > >> napisał(a): > >>> > >>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:54:07AM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > >>>> This patch adds device tree sources which are common for Cn913x SoCs > >>>> and the CN9130 development board (variant A). Wiring up of support > >>>> will be done in the follow-up commits. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <m...@semihalf.com> > >>> > >>> Again, I've not reviewed the contents extensively, *but* this patch > >>> cannot go into edk2-platforms - it has GPL licensed content. > >>> Was it meant for edk2-non-osi? Because we could take it there. > >> > >> Thanks for catching this - my oversight. The top-level DT files should > >> also be dual licenced (GPL2.0/MIT), same as recently submitted to > >> Linux. So IMO no need to go for edk2-non-osi. > > > > Right. MIT *is* an acceptable license, but no other licenses than > > BSD+Patent are blanket approved - it's a case by case basis. > > > > We still have a gap with regards to the explicit patent grant since > > the dropping of the TianoCore Contribution Agreement. While this is > > less problematic for something like .dts files, I don't think it can > > be argued that the problem does not exist for them. > > > > My preference for resolving this would be that anything merged into > > !edk2-non-osi (and, yes, we really ought to create an > > edk2-other-license or whatever) needs to use a license compatible with > > BSD+Patent (MIT is) and is registered as: > > > > SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent AND <other license> > > > > TL;DR: if you want to get the set merged quickly, edk2-non-osi is the > > best route for these files. > > no particular comments from me; what Leif suggests looks fine to me > (from orbit anyway) >
Ok, fair enough - since I cannot re-send with contribution agreement any more, I have to use edk2-non-osi path. Best regards, Marcin -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#46144): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/46144 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32882735/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
