On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 04:22:10PM +0100, Michael Brown wrote: > On 19/07/2019 12:53, Leif Lindholm wrote: > > The patches look good, and I don't mind you upstreaming Michael's > > code, *but* I don't want patches submitted with anyone other than the > > contributor's Signed-off-by:. (It's the equivalent of saying "Yeah, > > Michael says he's OK with https://developercertificate.org/, and of no > > actual use.) > > Sorry; this is almost certainly my fault.
Well, there is nothing *wrong* with that - only there is no value in second-hand signed-off-bys. > My Signed-off-by was present in > the original patches that I sent to Pete, and Pete kindly offered to take > care of upstreaming the patches for me. For the avoidance of any doubt: I > definitely agree to the statements in https://developercertificate.org/. Glad to hear it :) This means I *could* have included them, but... > I am happy for you to either drop or retain my Signed-off-by before pushing, > as you see fit. ...to reduce confusion, I dropped them before pushing - but you're still set as the author. If in future you contribute directly yourself, please keep the Signed-off-by in. Best Regards, Leif -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#44061): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/44061 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32502331/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
