Hi Ray, On 07/02/19 17:20, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 07/02/19 17:18, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 07/02/19 16:44, Ni, Ray wrote: >>> Laszlo, >>> I agree with your changes. >>> Will include your changes in V2. >> >> Thanks, Ray -- currently waiting for suitable hardware (with 5-level >> paging support) to become available internally @RH for my testing.
I hoped to provision a suitable server (with 5lvl paging) internally @RH for testing -- not just regression-testing -- your series, *quickly*. Unfortunately, my attempt at that has failed. So I can't provide that kind of test result now, and I don't want to block your work indefinitely. Please proceed with this series as necessary. (Do pick up my R-t-b from below please, after you incorporate the PatchInstructionX86() change.) Thanks! Laszlo >> On host hardware that does not support 5-level paging, there seem to be >> no adverse effects. >> >> Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> > > Forgot to mention that this applies with the PatchInstructionX86() > update in place. > > Thanks > Laszlo > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#43209): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/43209 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32239521/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
