Hi, > However: you're using a systemd-related UEFI boot loader, and I have > no clue whether it implements the above-referenced "fallback" > behavior. For now, I would suggest trying the shim+grub2 variant, and > even Fedora 29 rather than Fedora 28: > "fedora-29-efi-grub2-x86_64.qcow2.xz".
I can boot the images just fine with empty vars. Just noticed that the systemd image has a lowercase efi directory, so the fallback bootloader path is "efi/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI" not "EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI". Possibly that is the root cause for the problem. In theory it should not, FAT is case-insensitive after all, but who knows ... > ... I guess it's also possible that the UEFI boot loader in the disk > image that you've tried isn't properly signed, against the > certificates enrolled in "/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_VARS.secboot.fd". If > that's the case, the OVMF debug log will show it. Oh, in secure boot mode. The systemd images don't use shim, so that most likely isn't going to fly due to bootloader being unsigned. The grub2 variants should work. Never actually tested that though. cheers, Gerd -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#41927): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/41927 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/31718606/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
