Yes of course. Let's do! Best, moon
On 2015년 6월 14일 (일) at 오후 4:48 Alexander Bezzubov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Moon, mentors and fellow PPMCs, > > as soon as we all agree that the roadmap on the wiki looks awesome, shall > we 'itemize' it now in the JIRA issues? (and assign to planned versions) > Later sub-task can be added as needed. > > This will increase traceability and will allow broader set of contributors > to basically, contribute :) like taking an issue and start working on it by > proposing the solution, review, etc. > > Please, let me know what you guys think! > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:59 AM, moon soo Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm willing to resolve issue > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-67 (create release > branch) > > if there're no other opinions about creating release branch in next 24 > > hours. :-) So we can start prepare release from it. > > > > Thanks, > > moon > > > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:53 AM moon soo Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Zeppelin currently can work with from Spark version 1.1 to 1.4 > depending > > > on it's build profile. And Zeppelin build instruction demands user set > > > build profile for spark version they want. I think changing default > build > > > profile to 1.4 is not making any big impact to users. > > > > > > And Zeppelin used to use latest supported spark version as it's default > > > build profile. Recently spark 1.4 support has been added and spark 1.4 > is > > > released. Therefore i think it make sense to 1.4 being a default > version. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > moon > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:39 AM Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:31 AM, moon soo Lee <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > >> > I think it make sense to have 1.4 as a default version when Zeppelin > > is > > >> > being released. > > >> > > > >> > > >> Is this based on the needs of your users? > > >> > > >> How long will 1.4 last? What version will your users have during that > > >> time? > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > -- > Kind regards, > Alexander. >
