Hi, I like the idea or rotating responsibilities for the chair (report) things. I guess now it is the perfect time for us to try and learn how to handle that. Everybody (that volunteer) should have a change to try at least once.
Cheers, Anthony. On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Alex B. <[email protected]> wrote: > Just FYI: the reason I was suggesting a *rotation of responsibilities* at > first is exactly not to start the journey in ASF with "picking a Chair, VP, > etc". > > My suggestion is to give everyone equal opportunities to learn the bylaws > of foundation, earn merit, study Apache Way from more experienced members > first by doing everything necessary to represent the for ASF (of which > reporting came as a first example) > > > So in other words my proposal is to rotate all Chair responsibilities by a > "reporting period", and as before I'm willing to volunteer to do that. > > Otherwise I feel like an infant project might be in trap of not really > growing a democratic one.. > > > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:22 PM, moon soo Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have couple of questions about PMC and Incubator and how they work. > > > > Roman suggested pick one who acting as a Chair for Zeppelin for PMC > report. > > Would it be wrong if i understand that acting as a Chair is also need to > > take care of other things if there is an issue, just like TLP? > > (Or is it carefully designed rule with some purpose that project in > > incubator does not have Chair?) > > > > If having an acting as a Chair helps project, I'd like to volunteer, > while > > I believe I've been driving project and community from the beginning. > > > > > > About rotating PMC report responsibility Alex suggested, while Zeppelin > is > > in incubator, I agree on it's positive side with one little concern. > > Depends on when it graduates and number of new PPMC we can get, possibly > > some people may have no chances. It if does not make any problem, I'm > good > > with it and I'll take next report after the Alex. > > > > Best, > > moon > > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Alex B. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Sounds great, thank you for explanation Roman. > > > It is so true that to have such mentors as you guys is a great > > opportunity > > > for the project! > > > > > > If I may, I'd like to suggest we implement the *rotation of the > reporting > > > responsibility*: this way we maximise number of PPMC people involved in > > ASF > > > life. It should be possible as we have enough senior members on this > list > > > who can help. > > > > > > Having said that, I want to volunteer to take care of the next one, > > > February report. > > > > > > Please, let me know what you think. > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > 2) should we kindly ask other mentors to sign it off? Which makes > > > sense > > > > > to > > > > > > me, especially in light of ongoing discussion in Incubator list. > > > > > > > > > > Mentors are required to sign off on each and every report. I can > also > > > > > assure you that there'll be plenty of feedback for the first couple > > of > > > > > reports on dev@ ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > I have to say that having Roman as a co-mentor has not left me a lot > to > > > do > > > > (which is good since I am swatting pretty hard on Kylin). This means > > > that > > > > signing off the report is something that I look forward to doing. I > > > > finally get to do something! > > > > > > > > > >
