jongyoul commented on code in PR #4621:
URL: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/4621#discussion_r1236471742


##########
zeppelin-server/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/server/RestApiApplication.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.zeppelin.server;
+
+import java.util.HashSet;
+import java.util.Set;
+
+import javax.ws.rs.core.Application;
+
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.AdminRestApi;
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.ClusterRestApi;
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.ConfigurationsRestApi;
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.CredentialRestApi;
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.HeliumRestApi;
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.InterpreterRestApi;
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.LoginRestApi;
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.NotebookRepoRestApi;
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.NotebookRestApi;
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.SecurityRestApi;
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.SessionRestApi;
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.ZeppelinRestApi;
+import org.apache.zeppelin.rest.exception.WebApplicationExceptionMapper;
+
+public class RestApiApplication extends Application {
+  @Override
+  public Set<Class<?>> getClasses() {

Review Comment:
   Basically, we agreed to keep standards.  When we have a lot of contributors, 
it was ok to keep both of them but I, recently, feel like it's time to focus on 
what we will go for. It would be a long-term discussion and it doesn't mean 
that we should change rapidly to another framework or adopt a new tech. Keeping 
standards will, definitely, help to improve Zeppelin eventually. I just would 
like to talk to you broadly and freely. :-)



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@zeppelin.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to