I'll create a JIRA to track it, and then we can look how we can make it... On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 3:31 PM Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for raising this discussion, @Alex. I agree to drop supporting of > scala 2.10. > But I will prefer to make scala 2.11 as default. Because most of the > interpreter depends on scala 2.11. Although some interpreters support scala > 2.12 too, but scala 2.11 is still the most popular one I believe. Take > spark as example, spark 2.4.4 is the latest release of spark, its default > scala is still 2.11. > > One concern of dropping scala 2.10 is that it might break some interpreter, > such as beam, scalding, scio, I am not sure how much work needs to be done > to support scala 2.11 for these interpreters. And I am afraid the > maintainer of these interpreters are not active in community now. > > > > > > > Alex Ott <alex...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月10日周二 下午7:47写道： > > > Hi all > > > > Scala 2.10 was released ~7 years ago, and latest release in that series > was > > ~2 years ago. > > Right now most of the new products are built only for 2.11 & 2.12, so > maybe > > it makes sense to remove support of Scala 2.10 in Zeppelin 0.9? > > > > Also, giving the fact that 2.11 was released almost 5 years ago - should > be > > 2.12 a default target? > > > > -- > > With best wishes, Alex Ott > > http://alexott.net/ > > Twitter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) > > > > > -- > Best Regards > > Jeff Zhang > -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Twitter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
