I'd agree. Is there a course of actions you can propose? Disable all these tests is a not a long term solution, right?
_____________________________ From: Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com<mailto:zjf...@gmail.com>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 6:01 PM Subject: Re: Unstable travis CI recently To: <dev@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:dev@zeppelin.apache.org>> Should we disable these flaky test now ? CI seems become more unstable recently. It is almost useless for me, I never see a success CI recently. Here's one screenshot of recent closed PRs. Most of them has CI failure. IMO, this is pretty bad, especially for new contributors. [pasted1] Jun Kim <i2r....@gmail.com<mailto:i2r....@gmail.com>>?2016?12?13??? ??11:27??? @Hoon Thanks for your information :-) I should use that next time! 2016? 12? 13? (?) ?? 8:23, Park Hoon <1am...@gmail.com<mailto:1am...@gmail.com>>?? ??: > I totally agree with your opinions. I will work on ZEPPELIN-1739, > ZEPPELIN-1749 first i reported before. > > @Jun Kim. So true. We have to wait long time. FYI, we can use our own > travis CI containers to test (I recently learned also!) by configuring > your-github-id/zeppelin-repo in travis CI > > Thanks! > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Jun Kim > <i2r....@gmail.com<mailto:i2r....@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > I definitely agree with you! > > > > I reopened my PR twice recently to pass CI and it wasn't because of me. > > > > CI takes about ~40min for a test, so I had to wait 1h and 20min to write > a > > comment after passing CI T_T > > > > And the worst of it is that I don't believe CI's result more and more. > > > > 2016? 12? 13? (?) ?? 8:10, Jeff Zhang > > <zjf...@gmail.com<mailto:zjf...@gmail.com>>?? ??: > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > As you may notice that our travis CI is not stable recently. There's > many > > > flaky test, and it waste every developer's time to figure out whether > the > > > failure is due to your PR or flaky test. So I think it is time for us > to > > > make the CI stable. Here's tickets for all the flaky test. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > > 3D%20ZEPPELIN%20AND%20text%20~%20flaky%20and%20status%20!% > > 3D%20RESOLVED%20ORDER%20%20BY%20status%20ASC%20 > > > > > > Fixing the flaky test may take some time and may not easy for some test > > but > > > I think it is worth to do that. And it is better for these people who > > > familiar with that particular test case to fix it. What do you guys > > think ? > > > Thanks > > > > > -- > > Taejun Kim > > > > Data Mining Lab. > > School of Electrical and Computer Engineering > > University of Seoul > > > -- Taejun Kim Data Mining Lab. School of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Seoul
