Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1659
  
    
    
    
    ![](https://github.com/nodejs/LTS/raw/master/schedule.png)
    
    @bzz Thanks for review! Things you pointed out are very important. So I'v 
done some research about node and npm
    
    The above screenshot is about LTS schedule. 
    
    - Some apache projects use 4.x. but Active LTS will be end before 2017.04. 
So they (should) move to 6.x If they care about what they are building.
    - I used node [6.9.1](https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/) in this PR. This 
is one of LTS version for 6.x that means, it (6.x) is somewhat stabilised. 
([6.0.0 released in 2016.04](https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v6.0.0/))
    - **Basically, we use node as a tool**. **not the runtime**. In other 
words, we need something can boost our productivity instead of old one. For 
example, writing to build tools easily using es2015 or supporting fast 
compilation. ([6.9.1 supports es2015 99%](http://node.green/))
    
    Regard to npm
    
    - [npm 3.0.0 allow us to our dependencies to be installed maximally 
flat](https://github.com/npm/npm/releases/tag/v3.0.0). (will increasing 
download speed + support cache functionalities)
    - So we might use [node 5.x which shipped npm 
3.x](https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v5.0.0/) but 5.x is not LTS
    - So use 3.10.10 which is the most recent one. Even, we can use 
[4.0.3](https://github.com/npm/npm/releases) just released 2 days ago



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to